Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Shana M Solomon

Datos Biográficos

ID6209756
NOMBREShana M Solomon
NOMBRESShana M
APELLIDOSolomon
FIRMASOLOMON S M
AFILIACIONESCornell Law School
VERIFICADONo
TOTAL DE OBRAS1
TOTAL DE CITAS5
OBRAS COMO AUTOR1
OBRAS COMO EDITOR0
PRIMER AÑO DE PUBLICACIÓN1996
AÑO MÁS RECIENTE DE PUBLICACIÓN1996
ÍNDICE H1
  • Setting Boundaries between Science and Law

    Open Access•Shana M Solomon, E J Hackett•ARTICLE•Science Technology & Human Values•1996•Citada por: 5•Referencias: 14

    In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court made its first major pronouncement on the evaluation of scientific evidence, calling on judges to act as gatekeepers for scientific knowledge and validity, despite lack of scientific training among judges. Daubert offers the science studies community a case study for examining how judges (and scientists acting as experts) engage in boundary-work and construct scientific valid…

  • Setting Boundaries between Science and Law

    Open Access•Shana M Solomon, E J Hackett•ARTICLE•Science Technology & Human Values•1996•Citada por: 5•Referencias: 14

    In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court made its first major pronouncement on the evaluation of scientific evidence, calling on judges to act as gatekeepers for scientific knowledge and validity, despite lack of scientific training among judges. Daubert offers the science studies community a case study for examining how judges (and scientists acting as experts) engage in boundary-work and construct scientific valid…

  • Setting Boundaries between Science and Law

    Open Access•Shana M Solomon, E J Hackett•ARTICLE•Science Technology & Human Values•1996•Citada por: 5•Referencias: 14

    In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court made its first major pronouncement on the evaluation of scientific evidence, calling on judges to act as gatekeepers for scientific knowledge and validity, despite lack of scientific training among judges. Daubert offers the science studies community a case study for examining how judges (and scientists acting as experts) engage in boundary-work and construct scientific valid…

Adversarial system (1 obra) · Computer Science (1 obra) · Construct (python library (1 obra) · Epistemology (1 obra) · Ethics in Clinical Research (1 obra) · Federal Rules of Evidence (1 obra) · Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies (1 obra) · Law (1 obra) · Law (1 obra) · Philosophy and History of Science (1 obra)

Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae