Neal Haddaway

Datos Biográficos

ID6461587
NOMBRENeal Haddaway
NOMBRESNeal
APELLIDOHaddaway
FIRMAHADDAWAY N
AFILIACIONESUniversity of Johannesburg
ORCID0000-0003-3902-2234
VERIFICADOSí
TOTAL DE OBRAS12
TOTAL DE CITAS4
TOTAL COMO AUTOR12
TOTAL COMO EDITOR0
PRIMER AÑO DE PUBLICACIÓN2014
AÑO MÁS RECIENTE DE PUBLICACIÓN2025
ÍNDICE H1

  • Knowledge Gaps about Mining Impacts on Sami Lands

    Open AccessLaura Del Duca, Adriana Abril et al.ARTICLEJournal of Northern Studies2025

    In the context of the EU’s Critical Raw Materials Act, which prioritizes mineral extraction and imposes time limits on project approvals, there have been a surge of policy proposals that aim to expedite licenses for green industry projects. Meanwhile, the academic literature largely overlooks risks for Indigenous Sami rights and reindeer herding. In this paper, we examine if a similar knowledge gap exists in a key part of the practitioner literat…

  • Fatal flaws in systematic review conduct, and how to fix them—A commentary to Rao. et al. (2022)

    Open AccessNeal R Haddaway, Neal Haddaway et al.ARTICLESustainable Cities and Society2023

  • Prisma2020

    Open AccessNeal Haddaway, Matthew J Page et al.ARTICLECampbell Systematic Reviews2022

  • Temperate Regenerative Agriculture practices increase soil carbon but not crop yield—a meta-analysis

    Open AccessMatthew W Jordon, Kathy J Willis et al.ARTICLEEnvironmental Research Letters2022

    Regenerative Agriculture (RA) claims to build soil organic carbon (SOC) and increase crop yields through simultaneous adoption of a suite of management practices which restore soil health. However, this claim is largely unevidenced as few studies of fully integrated regenerative systems are currently available. As a first step to addressing this knowledge gap, we here examine three practices now being promoted as part of RA: reducing tillage inte…

  • A systematic global stocktake of evidence on human adaptation to climate change

    Open AccessLea Berrang-Ford, A R Siders et al.ARTICLENature Climate Change2021

  • Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources

    Open AccessMichael Gusenbauer, Neal HaddawayARTICLEResearch Synthesis Methods2020

    Rigorous evidence identification is essential for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses (evidence syntheses) because the sample selection of relevant studies determines a review's outcome, validity, and explanatory power. Yet, the search systems allowing access to this evidence provide varying levels of precision, recall, and reproducibility and also demand different levels of effort. To date, it remains unclear which search systems are most appro…

  • Circular nutrient solutions for agriculture and wastewater – a review of technologies and practices

    Open AccessArno Rosemarin, Biljana Macura et al.ARTICLECurrent Opinion in Environmental…2020

    This paper summarizes key findings from a series of systematic reviews and comprehensive efforts to collate evidence and expert opinions on circular solutions for recovery and reuse of nutrients and carbon from different waste streams in the agriculture and wastewater sectors. We identify established and emerging approaches for transformation towards a more circular nutrient economy with relevance to SDGs 6 and 14. The paper cites the example of …

  • Roses RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses

    Open AccessNeal Haddaway, Biljana Macura et al.ARTICLEEnvironmental Evidence2018

  • A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences

    Open AccessKaty L James, Nicola Randall et al.ARTICLEEnvironmental Evidence2016

    Systematic mapping was developed in social sciences in response to a lack of empirical data when answering questions using systematic review methods, and a need for a method to describe the literature across a broad subject of interest. Systematic mapping does not attempt to answer a specific question as do systematic reviews, but instead collates, describes and catalogues available evidence (e.g. primary, secondary, theoretical, economic) relati…

  • The benefits of systematic mapping to evidence-based environmental management

    Open AccessNeal R Haddaway, Neal Haddaway et al.ARTICLEAMBIO2016Citada por: 3Referencias: 23

    Reviews of evidence are a vital means of summarising growing bodies of research. Systematic reviews (SRs) aim to reduce bias and increase reliability when summarising high priority and controversial topics. Similar to SRs, systematic maps (SMs) were developed in social sciences to reliably catalogue evidence on a specific subject. Rather than providing answers to specific questions of impacts, SMs aim to produce searchable databases of studies, a…

  • The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching

    Open AccessNeal Haddaway, Neal Robert Haddaway et al.ARTICLEPLoS ONE2015

    Google Scholar (GS), a commonly used web-based academic search engine, catalogues between 2 and 100 million records of both academic and grey literature (articles not formally published by commercial academic publishers). Google Scholar collates results from across the internet and is free to use. As a result it has received considerable attention as a method for searching for literature, particularly in searches for grey literature, as required …

  • Maximizing Legacy and Impact of Primary Research

    Open AccessNeal R Haddaway, Neal HaddawayARTICLEAMBIO2014Citada por: 1Referencias: 17

    Much of the scientific literature in existence today is based on model systems and case studies, which help to split research into manageable blocks. The impact of this research can be greatly increased in meta-analyses that combine individual studies published over time to identify patterns across studies; patterns that may go undetected by smaller studies and that may not be the main subject of investigation. However, many potentially useful st…