Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Hallie Liberto

Datos Biográficos

ID6558974
NOMBREHallie Liberto
NOMBRESHallie
APELLIDOLiberto
FIRMALIBERTO H
AFILIACIONESUniversity of Connecticut
VERIFICADONo
TOTAL DE OBRAS6
TOTAL DE CITAS0
OBRAS COMO AUTOR6
OBRAS COMO EDITOR0
PRIMER AÑO DE PUBLICACIÓN2013
AÑO MÁS RECIENTE DE PUBLICACIÓN2021
ÍNDICE H0
  • Coercion, Consent, and the Mechanistic Question

    Hallie Liberto•ARTICLE•Ethics•2021

    In this article I examine the most prevalent explanation for why coercion ever undermines consent, an explanation that I call “moral debilitation.” On this view, the manipulative strategy of coercion can disempower an agent from making the relevant change to the moral world—one necessary to grant another person a permission. I argue that coercion rarely debilitates and that there is an alternate method for explaining why coercion ever undermines …

  • The Problem with Sexual Promises

    Hallie Liberto•ARTICLE•Ethics•2017

    I first distinguish promises with positive sexual content (e.g., promises to perform sexual acts) and promises with negative sexual content (e.g., promises to refrain from sexual acts—as one does when making monogamy promises). I argue that sexual content—even positive sexual content—does not cause a promise to misfire. However, the content of some successful promises is such that a promisee ought not to accept the promise, and, if she does accep…

  • Species Membership and the Veil of Ignorance

    Open Access•Hallie Liberto•ARTICLE•Utilitas•2016•Referencias: 1

    Mark Rowlands gives a compelling argument that, if John Rawls's contractarianism is consistently applied, and Rawls's premises fully explained, then we have powerful reasons to believe that representatives behind the Veil of Ignorance should be blind to species membership in the same way that they are blind to economic status and natural talent. 1 I argue that even if we suppose this to be correct, these agents would not choose the two principles…

  • The Moral Specification of Rights

    Open Access•Hallie Liberto•ARTICLE•Law and Philosophy•2014

  • Exploitation and the Vulnerability Clause

    Open Access•Hallie Liberto•ARTICLE•Ethical Theory and Moral Practice•2014

  • Noxious Markets versus Noxious Gift Relationships

    Hallie Liberto•ARTICLE•Social Theory and Practice•2013

Sin obras prominentes en esta página.

  • Noxious Markets versus Noxious Gift Relationships

    Hallie Liberto•ARTICLE•Social Theory and Practice•2013

  • The Moral Specification of Rights

    Open Access•Hallie Liberto•ARTICLE•Law and Philosophy•2014

  • Exploitation and the Vulnerability Clause

    Open Access•Hallie Liberto•ARTICLE•Ethical Theory and Moral Practice•2014

  • Species Membership and the Veil of Ignorance

    Open Access•Hallie Liberto•ARTICLE•Utilitas•2016•Referencias: 1

    Mark Rowlands gives a compelling argument that, if John Rawls's contractarianism is consistently applied, and Rawls's premises fully explained, then we have powerful reasons to believe that representatives behind the Veil of Ignorance should be blind to species membership in the same way that they are blind to economic status and natural talent. 1 I argue that even if we suppose this to be correct, these agents would not choose the two principles…

  • The Problem with Sexual Promises

    Hallie Liberto•ARTICLE•Ethics•2017

    I first distinguish promises with positive sexual content (e.g., promises to perform sexual acts) and promises with negative sexual content (e.g., promises to refrain from sexual acts—as one does when making monogamy promises). I argue that sexual content—even positive sexual content—does not cause a promise to misfire. However, the content of some successful promises is such that a promisee ought not to accept the promise, and, if she does accep…

  • Coercion, Consent, and the Mechanistic Question

    Hallie Liberto•ARTICLE•Ethics•2021

    In this article I examine the most prevalent explanation for why coercion ever undermines consent, an explanation that I call “moral debilitation.” On this view, the manipulative strategy of coercion can disempower an agent from making the relevant change to the moral world—one necessary to grant another person a permission. I argue that coercion rarely debilitates and that there is an alternate method for explaining why coercion ever undermines …

Law (4 obras) · Law and economics (4 obras) · Philosophy (4 obras) · Political Philosophy and Ethics (4 obras) · Political science (4 obras) · Sociology (4 obras) · Epistemology (3 obras) · Psychology (3 obras) · War, Ethics, and Justification (3 obras) · Computer Science (2 obras)

Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae