Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Norman J Finkel

Datos Biográficos

ID659187
NOMBRENorman J Finkel
NOMBRESNorman J
APELLIDOFinkel
FIRMAFINKEL N J
AFILIACIONESGeorgetown University
VERIFICADONo
TOTAL DE OBRAS31
TOTAL DE CITAS90
TOTAL COMO AUTOR30
TOTAL COMO EDITOR1
PRIMER AÑO DE PUBLICACIÓN1974
AÑO MÁS RECIENTE DE PUBLICACIÓN2006
ÍNDICE H6
  • Emotions and culpability

    Norman J Finkel, W Gerrod Parrott•BOOK•Emotions And Culpability: How the…•2006

    "This book investigates why, when, and how ordinary human beings hold some individuals guilty of crimes, but others less so or not at all. Why, for example, do the emotions of the accused sometimes aggravate a murder, making it a heinous crime, whereas other emotions might mitigate that murder to manslaughter, excuse a killing ("by reason of insanity"), or even justify it ("by reason of self-defense")? And what emotions on the part of jurors come…

  • Human Rights and Duties

    Norman J Finkel, F M Moghaddam•CHAPTER•The Psychology Of Rights And…•2006

  • Moral monsters and patriot acts

    Norman J Finkel•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2006•Referencias: 5

  • Emotions And Culpability

    Norman J Finkel, W Gerrod Parrott•BOOK•Emotions And Culpability: How the…•2006

  • The Psychology Of Rights And Duties

    Norman J Finkel, Fathali M Moghaddam•BOOK•The Psychology Of Rights And…•2004

  • Not fair!

    Norman J Finkel•BOOK•Not Fair!: The Typology of…•2001

    Not Fair! discusses unfairness in a broad historical, religious, legal, and psychological context and shows how age, gender, and culture are likely to play a part in how we decide what is fair or unfair.

  • Commonsense notions of unfairness in Japan and the United States

    Norman J Finkel, David Crystal et al.•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2001•Citada por: 1•Referencias: 24

  • Commonsense notions of unfairness in Japan and the United States

    Norman J Finkel, David Crystal et al.•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2001•Referencias: 23

  • When principles collide in hard cases

    Norman J Finkel•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2001•Referencias: 3

    Physical copy available at the Bioethics Research Library. Request at https://bioethics.georgetown.edu/using-the-library/item-hold-request-form

  • When principles collide in hard cases

    Norman J Finkel•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2001•Referencias: 14

  • Commonsense Morality Across Cultures

    Open Access•Norman J Finkel, Rom Harré et al.•ARTICLE•Discourse Studies•2001•Citada por: 2•Referencias: 22

    Two college-age samples, one from the United States (Washington, DC) and one from Spain (Madrid), were studied with mixed methods, phenomenological (with qualitative analyses) and traditional experimental (with quantitative analyses) - regarding the alleged foundational topic of `unfairness'. Participants gave their instantiations of `It's not fair!' (`No es justo'), which were deconstructed and qualitatively analyzed to find and compare the esse…

  • Commonsense judgments of infanticide

    Norman J Finkel, John E Burke et al.•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2000•Referencias: 4

    V. Dobson and B. Sales (2000) have found that law and science do not align over infanticide. In the present article, the authors examine commonsense justice and how community sentiment judges infanticide cases. First, analzing archival data, the authors find that sentiment has changed over some 450 years, roller coastering from lenient, to harsh, to lenient. Second, analyzing current trends, the authors find indications that sentiment is changing…

  • But it's not fair! Commonsense notions of unfairness

    Norman J Finkel•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2000

  • Commonsense justice and jury instructions

    Norman J Finkel•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2000

  • Commonsense judgments of infanticide

    Norman J Finkel, John E Burke et al.•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2000•Referencias: 2

  • Commonsense justice and jury instructions

    Norman J Finkel•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2000•Citada por: 4•Referencias: 54

  • But it's not fair! Commonsense notions of unfairness

    Norman J Finkel•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2000•Citada por: 5•Referencias: 58

  • Toward a Cultural Theory of Duties

    Open Access•F M Moghaddam, Nikki Slocum et al.•ARTICLE•Culture & Psychology•2000•Citada por: 12•Referencias: 8

    This article puts forward a number of propositions as a step toward a cultural theory of duties. The concept of 'duty' is set up in contrast to that of 'rights', in that while the former is owed to others, the latter are demanded of others. We believe that the psychology of duty has been neglected. Duties are associated with important continuities in social life, and to elaborate this point we introduce the concept of carriers, symbolic devices o…

  • Commonsense justice

    Norman J Finkel, Bruce D Sales•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•1997•Citada por: 1•Referencias: 6

  • Commonsense justice, psychology, and the law

    Norman J Finkel•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•1997

  • When mistakes happen

    Norman J Finkel, Jennifer Groscup et al.•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•1997

  • Commonsense justice

    Norman J Finkel, Bruce D Sales•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•1997•Citada por: 5

  • When mistakes happen

    Norman J Finkel, Jennifer Groscup et al.•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•1997•Citada por: 1

  • Commonsense justice, psychology, and the law

    Norman J Finkel•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•1997•Citada por: 6

  • Recidivism, Proportionalism, and Individualized Punishment

    Open Access•Norman J Finkel, Stephen T Maloney et al.•ARTICLE•American Behavioral Scientist•1996•Citada por: 8•Referencias: 12

    Politicians, armed with opinion polls for support, rush to enact crime bills where sentences grow steeper, where higher minimum sentences are made mandatory, and where the death sentence is applied in more cases. Despite apparent support from suspect polls, the empirical question remains: Does community sentiment favor "steeper-firmer-deadlier" punishments that are disproportionate to the act and invariate to the actors, or does sentiment favor i…

Siguiente
  • Strens and traumas

    Open Access•Norman J Finkel•ARTICLE•American Journal of Community…•1974•Citada por: 14•Referencias: 2

  • Strens, traumas, and trauma resolution

    Open Access•Norman J Finkel•ARTICLE•American Journal of Community…•1975•Citada por: 13•Referencias: 6

    With both primary and early secondary prevention in mind, this investigation sought to answer several basic questions regarding the resolution of traumas and their conversion into strens - growth-potentiating experiences. College volunteers (N = 40) described in detail their significant positive and negative experiences. The results indicate that many people did experience a trauma that was converted into a stren, and the resolution appeared to b…

  • Toward a Cultural Theory of Duties

    Open Access•F M Moghaddam, Nikki Slocum et al.•ARTICLE•Culture & Psychology•2000•Citada por: 12•Referencias: 8

    This article puts forward a number of propositions as a step toward a cultural theory of duties. The concept of 'duty' is set up in contrast to that of 'rights', in that while the former is owed to others, the latter are demanded of others. We believe that the psychology of duty has been neglected. Duties are associated with important continuities in social life, and to elaborate this point we introduce the concept of carriers, symbolic devices o…

  • Principals and Accessories in Capital Felony-Murder

    Open Access•Norman J Finkel, Stefanie F Smith•ARTICLE•Law & Society Review•1993•Citada por: 12•Referencias: 3

    In its 5-4 decision in Tison v. Arizona (1987), the Supreme Court put forth disputable empirical assertions about where community sentiment stood on the death penalty for felony-murder accessories. The Tison majority claimed that the community would support the death sentence for an accessory where (1) major participation and (2) reckless indifference to human life were shown. Two experiments were run to test these empirical assertions, and the r…

  • Recidivism, Proportionalism, and Individualized Punishment

    Open Access•Norman J Finkel, Stephen T Maloney et al.•ARTICLE•American Behavioral Scientist•1996•Citada por: 8•Referencias: 12

    Politicians, armed with opinion polls for support, rush to enact crime bills where sentences grow steeper, where higher minimum sentences are made mandatory, and where the death sentence is applied in more cases. Despite apparent support from suspect polls, the empirical question remains: Does community sentiment favor "steeper-firmer-deadlier" punishments that are disproportionate to the act and invariate to the actors, or does sentiment favor i…

  • Commonsense justice, psychology, and the law

    Norman J Finkel•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•1997•Citada por: 6

  • But it's not fair! Commonsense notions of unfairness

    Norman J Finkel•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2000•Citada por: 5•Referencias: 58

  • Commonsense justice

    Norman J Finkel, Bruce D Sales•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•1997•Citada por: 5

  • Significant life experiences in an adult sample

    Open Access•Norman J Finkel, Catherine A Jacobsen et al.•ARTICLE•American Journal of Community…•1977•Citada por: 5•Referencias: 4

    This study sought to focus on the significant life experiences of an adult sample (n = 45, ages 30-60); in particular, stress, traumas, and trauma-resolved experiences were examined and compared to like experiences of an undergraduate sample. The results for the adults revealed that two-thirds of the sample were able to convert traumas into strens, and the ability seemed to be dependent more on the person than the specific event. Success at conve…

  • Commonsense justice and jury instructions

    Norman J Finkel•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2000•Citada por: 4•Referencias: 54

  • Commonsense Morality Across Cultures

    Open Access•Norman J Finkel, Rom Harré et al.•ARTICLE•Discourse Studies•2001•Citada por: 2•Referencias: 22

    Two college-age samples, one from the United States (Washington, DC) and one from Spain (Madrid), were studied with mixed methods, phenomenological (with qualitative analyses) and traditional experimental (with quantitative analyses) - regarding the alleged foundational topic of `unfairness'. Participants gave their instantiations of `It's not fair!' (`No es justo'), which were deconstructed and qualitatively analyzed to find and compare the esse…

  • Commonsense notions of unfairness in Japan and the United States

    Norman J Finkel, David Crystal et al.•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2001•Citada por: 1•Referencias: 24

  • Commonsense justice

    Norman J Finkel, Bruce D Sales•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•1997•Citada por: 1•Referencias: 6

  • When mistakes happen

    Norman J Finkel, Jennifer Groscup et al.•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•1997•Citada por: 1

  • Prestidigitation, statistical magic, and Supreme Court numerology in juvenile death penalty cases

    Norman J Finkel•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•1995•Citada por: 1

    In the Supreme Court's Eighth Amendment jurisprudence, ''community sentiment'' comes to the fore in judging whether a punishment is cruel and unusual, but the Court is sharply divided over whether ''objective indicia'' should be solely determinative, or whether the moral sentiments of the Justices (i.e., a proportionality analysis) should be permitted. Whereas Justices are committed to doing social science to gauge community sentiment, they are a…

  • Strens and traumas

    Open Access•Norman J Finkel•ARTICLE•American Journal of Community…•1974•Citada por: 14•Referencias: 2

  • Strens, traumas, and trauma resolution

    Open Access•Norman J Finkel•ARTICLE•American Journal of Community…•1975•Citada por: 13•Referencias: 6

    With both primary and early secondary prevention in mind, this investigation sought to answer several basic questions regarding the resolution of traumas and their conversion into strens - growth-potentiating experiences. College volunteers (N = 40) described in detail their significant positive and negative experiences. The results indicate that many people did experience a trauma that was converted into a stren, and the resolution appeared to b…

  • Significant life experiences in an adult sample

    Open Access•Norman J Finkel, Catherine A Jacobsen et al.•ARTICLE•American Journal of Community…•1977•Citada por: 5•Referencias: 4

    This study sought to focus on the significant life experiences of an adult sample (n = 45, ages 30-60); in particular, stress, traumas, and trauma-resolved experiences were examined and compared to like experiences of an undergraduate sample. The results for the adults revealed that two-thirds of the sample were able to convert traumas into strens, and the ability seemed to be dependent more on the person than the specific event. Success at conve…

  • Principals and Accessories in Capital Felony-Murder

    Open Access•Norman J Finkel, Stefanie F Smith•ARTICLE•Law & Society Review•1993•Citada por: 12•Referencias: 3

    In its 5-4 decision in Tison v. Arizona (1987), the Supreme Court put forth disputable empirical assertions about where community sentiment stood on the death penalty for felony-murder accessories. The Tison majority claimed that the community would support the death sentence for an accessory where (1) major participation and (2) reckless indifference to human life were shown. Two experiments were run to test these empirical assertions, and the r…

  • Prestidigitation, statistical magic, and Supreme Court numerology in juvenile death penalty cases

    Norman J Finkel•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•1995

  • Prestidigitation, statistical magic, and Supreme Court numerology in juvenile death penalty cases

    Norman J Finkel•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•1995•Citada por: 1

    In the Supreme Court's Eighth Amendment jurisprudence, ''community sentiment'' comes to the fore in judging whether a punishment is cruel and unusual, but the Court is sharply divided over whether ''objective indicia'' should be solely determinative, or whether the moral sentiments of the Justices (i.e., a proportionality analysis) should be permitted. Whereas Justices are committed to doing social science to gauge community sentiment, they are a…

  • Recidivism, Proportionalism, and Individualized Punishment

    Open Access•Norman J Finkel, Stephen T Maloney et al.•ARTICLE•American Behavioral Scientist•1996•Citada por: 8•Referencias: 12

    Politicians, armed with opinion polls for support, rush to enact crime bills where sentences grow steeper, where higher minimum sentences are made mandatory, and where the death sentence is applied in more cases. Despite apparent support from suspect polls, the empirical question remains: Does community sentiment favor "steeper-firmer-deadlier" punishments that are disproportionate to the act and invariate to the actors, or does sentiment favor i…

  • Commonsense justice

    Norman J Finkel, Bruce D Sales•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•1997•Citada por: 1•Referencias: 6

  • Commonsense justice, psychology, and the law

    Norman J Finkel•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•1997

  • When mistakes happen

    Norman J Finkel, Jennifer Groscup et al.•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•1997

  • Commonsense justice

    Norman J Finkel, Bruce D Sales•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•1997•Citada por: 5

  • When mistakes happen

    Norman J Finkel, Jennifer Groscup et al.•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•1997•Citada por: 1

  • Commonsense justice, psychology, and the law

    Norman J Finkel•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•1997•Citada por: 6

  • Commonsense judgments of infanticide

    Norman J Finkel, John E Burke et al.•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2000•Referencias: 4

    V. Dobson and B. Sales (2000) have found that law and science do not align over infanticide. In the present article, the authors examine commonsense justice and how community sentiment judges infanticide cases. First, analzing archival data, the authors find that sentiment has changed over some 450 years, roller coastering from lenient, to harsh, to lenient. Second, analyzing current trends, the authors find indications that sentiment is changing…

  • But it's not fair! Commonsense notions of unfairness

    Norman J Finkel•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2000

  • Commonsense justice and jury instructions

    Norman J Finkel•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2000

  • Commonsense judgments of infanticide

    Norman J Finkel, John E Burke et al.•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2000•Referencias: 2

  • Commonsense justice and jury instructions

    Norman J Finkel•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2000•Citada por: 4•Referencias: 54

  • But it's not fair! Commonsense notions of unfairness

    Norman J Finkel•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2000•Citada por: 5•Referencias: 58

  • Toward a Cultural Theory of Duties

    Open Access•F M Moghaddam, Nikki Slocum et al.•ARTICLE•Culture & Psychology•2000•Citada por: 12•Referencias: 8

    This article puts forward a number of propositions as a step toward a cultural theory of duties. The concept of 'duty' is set up in contrast to that of 'rights', in that while the former is owed to others, the latter are demanded of others. We believe that the psychology of duty has been neglected. Duties are associated with important continuities in social life, and to elaborate this point we introduce the concept of carriers, symbolic devices o…

  • Not fair!

    Norman J Finkel•BOOK•Not Fair!: The Typology of…•2001

    Not Fair! discusses unfairness in a broad historical, religious, legal, and psychological context and shows how age, gender, and culture are likely to play a part in how we decide what is fair or unfair.

  • Commonsense notions of unfairness in Japan and the United States

    Norman J Finkel, David Crystal et al.•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2001•Citada por: 1•Referencias: 24

  • Commonsense notions of unfairness in Japan and the United States

    Norman J Finkel, David Crystal et al.•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2001•Referencias: 23

  • When principles collide in hard cases

    Norman J Finkel•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2001•Referencias: 3

    Physical copy available at the Bioethics Research Library. Request at https://bioethics.georgetown.edu/using-the-library/item-hold-request-form

  • When principles collide in hard cases

    Norman J Finkel•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2001•Referencias: 14

Psychology (21 obras) · Political science (15 obras) · Criminology (12 obras) · Law (11 obras) · Jury Decision Making Processes (9 obras) · Epistemology (8 obras) · Political Philosophy and Ethics (8 obras) · Economic Justice (7 obras) · Law (7 obras) · Social Psychology (7 obras)

Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae