Nicolas Dendoncker

Datos Biográficos

ID683597
NOMBRENicolas Dendoncker
NOMBRESNicolas
APELLIDODendoncker
FIRMADENDONCKER N
AFILIACIONESUniversity of Namur
ORCID0000-0001-9129-9025
VERIFICADOSí
TOTAL DE OBRAS22
TOTAL DE CITAS17
TOTAL COMO AUTOR22
TOTAL COMO EDITOR0
PRIMER AÑO DE PUBLICACIÓN2006
AÑO MÁS RECIENTE DE PUBLICACIÓN2026
ÍNDICE H2

  • Transition and transformation

    Open AccessJoséphine Dalimier, Kevin Maréchal et al.ARTICLEEnvironmental Innovation and…2026

    The terms "transition" and "transformation" are frequently used to describe systemic and sustainable change. However, their conceptual boundaries remain ambiguous. While some studies suggest semantic overlap, others emphasize subtle distinctions. Nonetheless, few have examined their mutual contributions when used jointly. This paper presents a qualitative analysis of food systems literature that distinguishes between the two terms. Two key findin…

  • Agriculture (re)-territorialisation

    Open AccessN Loodts, Christine Frison et al.ARTICLESustainability Science2025Referencias: 15

  • Exploring human-nature relationships in academic literature on the nitrogen cycle

    Open AccessBede West, Maximilian Bauer et al.ARTICLEEcosystems and People2024

    The nitrogen (N) cycle is a familiar concept. As is the much simplified, often diagrammatic, representation commonly used to illustrate the scale, importance and interconnectedness of this global cycle that links air, water, rocks and living beings. However, in this representation, humans are often presented as a seemingly minor entity or not explicitly shown at all. This can obscure the idea that humanity is both a direct beneficiary of the nitr…

  • Identifying visions on agricultural diversification

    Open AccessCarine Pachoud, Nicolas Dendoncker et al.ARTICLESustainability Science2024Citada por: 2Referencias: 5

  • Diverse values of nature for sustainability

    Open AccessUnai Pascual, Patricia Balvanera et al.ARTICLENature2023

    Twenty-five years since foundational publications on valuing ecosystem services for human well-being 1,2 , addressing the global biodiversity crisis 3 still implies confronting barriers to incorporating nature’s diverse values into decision-making. These barriers include powerful interests supported by current norms and legal rules such as property rights, which determine whose values and which values of nature are acted on. A better understandin…

  • Whose values count? A review of the nature valuation studies with a focus on justice

    Open AccessMarije Schaafsma, Seongho Ahn et al.ARTICLECurrent Opinion in Environmental…2023

    The Values Assessment of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services shows that multiple valuation methods and approaches exist to assess diverse value types. The evidence is based on the largest review of academic valuation studies on nature to date, developed for the Values Assessment of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). We evaluate studies acco…

  • The pitfalls of plural valuation

    Open AccessSander Jacobs, Eszter Kelemen et al.ARTICLECurrent Opinion in Environmental…2023Citada por: 1Referencias: 13

    This paper critically examines the current political context in which valuation studies of nature are undertaken. It challenges the belief that somehow, more and technically better valuation will drive the societal change toward more just and sustainable futures. Instead, we argue that current and proposed valuation practices risk to continue to overrepresent the values of those who hold power and dominate the valuation space, and to perpetuate t…

  • Five steps towards transformative valuation of nature

    Open AccessMette Termansen, Sander Jacobs et al.ARTICLECurrent Opinion in Environmental…2023Citada por: 2Referencias: 5

    The Values Assessment (VA) of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services shows that while a wide range of valuation methods exist to include nature's values in diverse decision-making contexts, uptake of these methods remains limited. Building on the VA, this paper reviews five critical steps in the evaluation of project or policy proposals that can improve the inclusion of nature’s values in decisions. F…

  • Mapping abundance distributions of allergenic tree species in urbanized landscapes

    Open AccessSébastien Dujardin, Michiel Stas et al.ARTICLELandscape and Urban Planning2022

  • Agriculture (re-)territorialisation

    Open AccessNicolas Loodts, Christine Frison et al.ARTICLESustainability Science2022

  • Residential green space types, allergy symptoms and mental health in a cohort of tree pollen allergy patients

    Open AccessMichiel Stas, Raf Aerts et al.ARTICLELandscape and Urban Planning2021

  • An evaluation of species distribution models to estimate tree diversity at genus level in a heterogeneous urban-rural landscape

    Open AccessMichiel Stas, Raf Aerts et al.ARTICLELandscape and Urban Planning2020

  • Improving collaboration between ecosystem service communities and the Ipbes science-policy platform

    Open AccessCarla-Leanne Washbourne, Nicolas Dendoncker et al.ARTICLEEcosystems and People2020

    The end of the first working program of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) provided an opportunity to draw lessons from its work. This perspective paper captures insights from ecosystem services (ES) researchers and practitioners, largely drawing from the European context (referred to herein as ‘ES community’), on this key science–policy interface. We synthesize reflections from a workshop…

  • The science-policy interface on ecosystems and people

    Open AccessPatricia Balvanera, Sander Jacobs et al.ARTICLEEcosystems and People2020

    Introduction \nThe complex links and feedbacks between ecosystems and people are now sharply in focus. Our growing understandings of the complex relations between ecosystems and people, the social and ecological drivers of changes in nature, and the different dimensions of a good quality of life, from local to global scales, have made these interdependencies ever more visible (IPBES 2019; Díaz et al. 2019). Furthermore, recent studies have reveal…

  • Linking equity, power, and stakeholders' roles in relation to ecosystem services

    Open AccessAméline Vallet, Bruno Locatelli et al.ARTICLEConservation Ecology2019Citada por: 4

    Vallet, A., B. Locatelli, H. Levrel, N. Dendoncker, C. Barnaud, and Y. Quispe Conde. 2019. Linking equity, power, and stakeholders’ roles in relation to ecosystem services. Ecology and Society 24(2):14. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10904-240214

  • How can integrated valuation of ecosystem services help understanding and steering agroecological transitions

    Open AccessNicolas Dendoncker, Fanny Boeraeve et al.ARTICLEConservation Ecology2018Citada por: 1

    Dendoncker, N., F. Boeraeve, E. Crouzat, M. Dufrêne, A. König, and C. Barnaud. 2018. How can integrated valuation of ecosystem services help understanding and steering agroecological transitions?. Ecology and Society 23(1):12. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09843-230112

  • Participatory identification and selection of ecosystem services

    Open AccessFanny Boeraeve, Marc Dufrene et al.ARTICLEConservation Ecology2018Citada por: 1

    Boeraeve, F., M. Dufrêne, R. De Vreese, S. Jacobs, N. Pipart, F. Turkelboom, W. Verheyden, and N. Dendoncker. 2018. Participatory identification and selection of ecosystem services: building on field experiences. Ecology and Society 23(2):27. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10087-230227

  • Ecosystem services, social interdependencies, and collective action

    Open AccessCecile Barnaud, Esteve Corbera et al.ARTICLEConservation Ecology2018Citada por: 5

    Barnaud, C., E. Corbera, R. Muradian, N. Salliou, C. Sirami, A. Vialatte, J.-P. Choisis, N. Dendoncker, R. Mathevet, C. Moreau, V. Reyes-García, M. Boada, M. Deconchat, C. Cibien, S. Garnier, R. Maneja, and M. Antona. 2018. Ecosystem services, social interdependencies, and collective action: a conceptual framework. Ecology and Society 23(1):15. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09848-230115

  • Au-delà des idées reçues

    Sofia Baltazar, Marjolein Visser et al.ARTICLEÉtudes rurales2018Citada por: 1Referencias: 16

    Possible operational levers to improve agricultural innovation systems include innovation platforms to support interaction among various stakeholders. Seed networks are one such example. Li Mestère, the irst network of this type in Wallonia, has brought together a diverse range of stakeholders to manage the crop diversity of cereals. It facilitates the circulation of seeds, knowledge and know-how that are inaccessible in the formal seed system. H…

  • A new valuation school

    Open AccessSander Jacobs, Nicolas Dendoncker et al.ARTICLEEcosystem Services2016

    We are increasingly confronted with severe social and economic impacts of environmental degradation all over the world. From a valuation perspective, environmental problems and conflicts originate from trade-offs between values. The urgency and importance to integrate nature's diverse values in decisions and actions stand out more than ever. Valuation, in its broad sense of ‘assigning importance’, is inherently part of most decisions on natural r…

  • Spatio-temporal migration patterns to and from an upland village of Mindanao, Philippines

    Open AccessFrançois Mialhe, Peter Walpole et al.ARTICLEPopulation and Environment2014Referencias: 36

  • A coherent set of future land use change scenarios for Europe

    Open AccessMark Rounsevell, M D A Rounsevell et al.ARTICLEAgriculture, Ecosystems &…2006