Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Kent Bach

Datos Biográficos

ID735225
NOMBREKent Bach
NOMBRESKent
APELLIDOBach
FIRMABACH K
AFILIACIONESSan Francisco State University
VERIFICADONo
TOTAL DE OBRAS30
TOTAL DE CITAS85
TOTAL COMO AUTOR30
TOTAL COMO EDITOR0
PRIMER AÑO DE PUBLICACIÓN1970
AÑO MÁS RECIENTE DE PUBLICACIÓN2018
ÍNDICE H5
  • Loaded Words

    Kent Bach•BOOK•Bad Words•2018

    What, as a matter of linguistic meaning, is added by referring to people with a slurring term rather than with its neutral counterpart? Hybrid expressivism says that slurs have the same descriptive contents as their neutral counterparts and that what distinguishes them is an expressive component. This chapter argues that hybrid expressivism gets the order of explanation backwards and it offers an alternative, loaded descriptivism. This says that …

  • The Predicate View of Proper Names

    Open Access•Kent Bach•ARTICLE•Philosophy Compass•2015•Citada por: 4•Referencias: 24

    The Millian view that the meaning of a proper name is simply its referent has long been popular among philosophers of language. It might even be deemed the orthodox view, despite its well-known difficulties. Fregean and Russellian alternatives, though widely discussed, are much less popular. The Predicate View has not even been taken seriously, at least until fairly recently, but finally, it is receiving the attention it deserves. It says that a …

  • Minimal Semantics

    Kent Bach•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•2007•Citada por: 1

    Book Review| April 01 2007 Minimal Semantics Emma Borg, Minimal Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. x + 288 pp. Kent Bach Kent Bach Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google The Philosophical Review (2007) 116 (2): 303–306. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-2006-045 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Permissions Search Site Citation Kent Bach; Minimal Semantics. The Philosophical Review …

  • Literal Meaning

    Open Access•Kent Bach•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2007•Citada por: 2

  • The Excluded Middle

    Open Access•Kent Bach•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2006•Citada por: 11

  • Optimality Theory and Pragmatics

    Anne Bezuidenhout, Ralf Vogel et al.•BOOK•Optimality Theory and Pragmatics•2003

  • Speaking Loosely

    Open Access•Kent Bach•ARTICLE•Midwest Studies in Philosophy•2001

  • You Don't Say

    Open Access•Kent Bach•ARTICLE•Synthese•2001•Citada por: 32•Referencias: 19

  • Concepts

    Kent Bach•REVIEW•The Philosophical Review•2000

    1. Philosophical Introduction: The Background Theory. 2. Unphilosophical Introduction: What Concepts Have To Be. 3. The Demise of Definitions, Part I: The Linguist's Tale. 4. The Demise of Definitions, Part II: The Philosopher's Tale. 5. Prototypes and Compositionality. (Appendix 5A: Meaning Postulates. Appendix 5B: The 'Theory Theory' of Concepts.) 6. Innateness and Ontology, Part I: The Standard Argument. (Appendix 6A: Similarity.) 7. Innatenes…

  • Concepts

    Kent Bach•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•2000

    Book Review| October 01 2000 Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong CONCEPTS: WHERE COGNITIVE SCIENCE WENT WRONG. By Jerry A. Fodor. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998. Pp. xii, 174. Kent Bach Kent Bach Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google The Philosophical Review (2000) 109 (4): 627–632. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-109-4-627 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Permissions Search …

  • The Myth of Conventional Implicature

    Open Access•Kent Bach•ARTICLE•Linguistics and Philosophy•1999

  • Picoeconomics

    Kent Bach, George Ainslie•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1995•Citada por: 6

  • Conversational Impliciture

    Open Access•Kent Bach•ARTICLE•Mind & Language•1994

    Confusion in terms inspires confusion in concepts. When a relevant distinction is not clearly marked or not marked at all, it is apt to be blurred or even missed altogether in our thinking. This is true in any area of inquiry, pragmatics in particular. No one disputes that there are various ways in which what is communicated in an utterance can go beyond sentence meaning, [1] The problem is to catalog the ways. It is generally recognized that lin…

  • Representation, Meaning, and Thought

    Kent Bach, Grant Gillett•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1994

  • Thought and Reference

    Bernard W Kobes, Kent Bach•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1991

  • Thought and Reference

    Christopher A Brewster, Christopher Brewster et al.•ARTICLE•Language•1990

  • Thought and Reference

    Michael Luntley, Kent Bach•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Quarterly•1990

    Journal Article Book Reviews Get access Thought and Reference. By Kent Bach. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988. Pp. ix + 305. Price £27.50.) Michael Luntley Michael Luntley The London School of Economics Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 40, Issue 159, April 1990, Pages 266–270, https://doi.org/10.2307/2219820 Published: 01 April 1990

  • Change in View

    Kent Bach, Gilbert Harman•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1988•Citada por: 1

  • The Structure of Emotions

    Kent Bach, Robert M Gordon•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1988•Citada por: 1

  • Spreading the Word

    Kent Bach, Simon Blackburn•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1987

  • More on Self-Deception

    Kent Bach•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1985

    In his recent critique of my account of self-deception,' Nathan Hellman' seems content with my resolution of the paradoxes of self-deception but charges that I have either ignored or skillfully downplayed certain deeper problems (I 1 3). He finds me oblivious (i zo) to certain counterexamples to my analysis but graciously allows that I do seem to be completely opaque (I 17) to the puzzles that remain. In this reply I wish to answer his two main o…

  • Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts

    Open Access•Georgia M Green, Kent Bach et al.•ARTICLE•Language•1983

  • Russell was right (almost)

    Open Access•Kent Bach•ARTICLE•Synthese•1983•Referencias: 8

  • Referential/attributive

    Open Access•Kent Bach•ARTICLE•Synthese•1981•Citada por: 3

  • An Analysis of Self-Deception

    Kent Bach•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1981•Citada por: 10

Siguiente
  • You Don't Say

    Open Access•Kent Bach•ARTICLE•Synthese•2001•Citada por: 32•Referencias: 19

  • The Excluded Middle

    Open Access•Kent Bach•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2006•Citada por: 11

  • An Analysis of Self-Deception

    Kent Bach•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1981•Citada por: 10

  • Picoeconomics

    Kent Bach, George Ainslie•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1995•Citada por: 6

  • Meaning and the Moral Sciences

    Kent Bach, Hilary Putnam•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1979•Citada por: 5

  • Analytic Social Philosophy—Basic Concepts

    Open Access•Kent Bach•ARTICLE•Journal for the Theory of Social…•1975•Citada por: 5•Referencias: 15

  • The Predicate View of Proper Names

    Open Access•Kent Bach•ARTICLE•Philosophy Compass•2015•Citada por: 4•Referencias: 24

    The Millian view that the meaning of a proper name is simply its referent has long been popular among philosophers of language. It might even be deemed the orthodox view, despite its well-known difficulties. Fregean and Russellian alternatives, though widely discussed, are much less popular. The Predicate View has not even been taken seriously, at least until fairly recently, but finally, it is receiving the attention it deserves. It says that a …

  • Part of What a Picture Is

    Kent Bach•ARTICLE•The British Journal of Aesthetics•1970•Citada por: 4

    Journal Article PART OF WHAT A PICTURE IS Get access Kent Bach Kent Bach Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The British Journal of Aesthetics, Volume 10, Issue 2, April 1970, Pages 119–137, https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaesthetics/10.2.119 Published: 01 April 1970

  • Referential/attributive

    Open Access•Kent Bach•ARTICLE•Synthese•1981•Citada por: 3

  • Literal Meaning

    Open Access•Kent Bach•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2007•Citada por: 2

  • Minimal Semantics

    Kent Bach•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•2007•Citada por: 1

    Book Review| April 01 2007 Minimal Semantics Emma Borg, Minimal Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. x + 288 pp. Kent Bach Kent Bach Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google The Philosophical Review (2007) 116 (2): 303–306. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-2006-045 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Permissions Search Site Citation Kent Bach; Minimal Semantics. The Philosophical Review …

  • Change in View

    Kent Bach, Gilbert Harman•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1988•Citada por: 1

  • The Structure of Emotions

    Kent Bach, Robert M Gordon•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1988•Citada por: 1

  • Part of What a Picture Is

    Kent Bach•ARTICLE•The British Journal of Aesthetics•1970•Citada por: 4

    Journal Article PART OF WHAT A PICTURE IS Get access Kent Bach Kent Bach Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The British Journal of Aesthetics, Volume 10, Issue 2, April 1970, Pages 119–137, https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaesthetics/10.2.119 Published: 01 April 1970

  • Analytic Social Philosophy—Basic Concepts

    Open Access•Kent Bach•ARTICLE•Journal for the Theory of Social…•1975•Citada por: 5•Referencias: 15

  • "When to Ask, "What if Everyone Did That

    Kent Bach•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1977

  • Linguistic communication and speech acts

    Kent Bach•BOOK•Linguistic communication and…•1979

  • Meaning and the Moral Sciences

    Kent Bach, Hilary Putnam•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1979•Citada por: 5

  • Referential/attributive

    Open Access•Kent Bach•ARTICLE•Synthese•1981•Citada por: 3

  • An Analysis of Self-Deception

    Kent Bach•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1981•Citada por: 10

  • Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts

    Open Access•Georgia M Green, Kent Bach et al.•ARTICLE•Language•1983

  • Russell was right (almost)

    Open Access•Kent Bach•ARTICLE•Synthese•1983•Referencias: 8

  • More on Self-Deception

    Kent Bach•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1985

    In his recent critique of my account of self-deception,' Nathan Hellman' seems content with my resolution of the paradoxes of self-deception but charges that I have either ignored or skillfully downplayed certain deeper problems (I 1 3). He finds me oblivious (i zo) to certain counterexamples to my analysis but graciously allows that I do seem to be completely opaque (I 17) to the puzzles that remain. In this reply I wish to answer his two main o…

  • Spreading the Word

    Kent Bach, Simon Blackburn•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1987

  • Change in View

    Kent Bach, Gilbert Harman•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1988•Citada por: 1

  • The Structure of Emotions

    Kent Bach, Robert M Gordon•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1988•Citada por: 1

  • Thought and Reference

    Christopher A Brewster, Christopher Brewster et al.•ARTICLE•Language•1990

  • Thought and Reference

    Michael Luntley, Kent Bach•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Quarterly•1990

    Journal Article Book Reviews Get access Thought and Reference. By Kent Bach. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988. Pp. ix + 305. Price £27.50.) Michael Luntley Michael Luntley The London School of Economics Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 40, Issue 159, April 1990, Pages 266–270, https://doi.org/10.2307/2219820 Published: 01 April 1990

  • Thought and Reference

    Bernard W Kobes, Kent Bach•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1991

  • Conversational Impliciture

    Open Access•Kent Bach•ARTICLE•Mind & Language•1994

    Confusion in terms inspires confusion in concepts. When a relevant distinction is not clearly marked or not marked at all, it is apt to be blurred or even missed altogether in our thinking. This is true in any area of inquiry, pragmatics in particular. No one disputes that there are various ways in which what is communicated in an utterance can go beyond sentence meaning, [1] The problem is to catalog the ways. It is generally recognized that lin…

  • Representation, Meaning, and Thought

    Kent Bach, Grant Gillett•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•1994

  • Picoeconomics

    Kent Bach, George Ainslie•ARTICLE•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1995•Citada por: 6

  • The Myth of Conventional Implicature

    Open Access•Kent Bach•ARTICLE•Linguistics and Philosophy•1999

  • Concepts

    Kent Bach•REVIEW•The Philosophical Review•2000

    1. Philosophical Introduction: The Background Theory. 2. Unphilosophical Introduction: What Concepts Have To Be. 3. The Demise of Definitions, Part I: The Linguist's Tale. 4. The Demise of Definitions, Part II: The Philosopher's Tale. 5. Prototypes and Compositionality. (Appendix 5A: Meaning Postulates. Appendix 5B: The 'Theory Theory' of Concepts.) 6. Innateness and Ontology, Part I: The Standard Argument. (Appendix 6A: Similarity.) 7. Innatenes…

  • Concepts

    Kent Bach•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•2000

    Book Review| October 01 2000 Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong CONCEPTS: WHERE COGNITIVE SCIENCE WENT WRONG. By Jerry A. Fodor. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998. Pp. xii, 174. Kent Bach Kent Bach Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google The Philosophical Review (2000) 109 (4): 627–632. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-109-4-627 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Permissions Search …

  • Speaking Loosely

    Open Access•Kent Bach•ARTICLE•Midwest Studies in Philosophy•2001

  • You Don't Say

    Open Access•Kent Bach•ARTICLE•Synthese•2001•Citada por: 32•Referencias: 19

  • Optimality Theory and Pragmatics

    Anne Bezuidenhout, Ralf Vogel et al.•BOOK•Optimality Theory and Pragmatics•2003

Philosophy (20 obras) · Computer Science (15 obras) · Epistemology (15 obras) · Linguistics (11 obras) · Psychology (11 obras) · Philosophy and Theoretical Science (10 obras) · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (6 obras) · Library science (6 obras) · Citation (5 obras) · Contemporary philosophy (5 obras)

Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae