Sjors Ligthart
Datos Biográficos
| ID | 8520421 |
|---|---|
| NOMBRE | Sjors Ligthart |
| NOMBRES | Sjors |
| APELLIDO | Ligthart |
| FIRMA | LIGTHART S |
| AFILIACIONES | Tilburg University |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-6458-4058 |
| VERIFICADO | Sí |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 5 |
| TOTAL DE CITAS | 0 |
| OBRAS COMO AUTOR | 5 |
| OBRAS COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMER AÑO DE PUBLICACIÓN | 2021 |
| AÑO MÁS RECIENTE DE PUBLICACIÓN | 2025 |
| ÍNDICE H | 0 |
Reconsidering the absolute nature of the right to freedom of thought
The right to freedom of thought (RFoT) is generally considered to imply three substantive freedoms: that inner thoughts shall not be impermissibly altered; that persons shall not be forced to reveal their unmanifested thoughts; and that persons shall not be punished for their thoughts. It is often assumed that the right protects these freedoms in an absolute way. This article challenges the assumption that the RFoT is completely absolute in estab…
Right to mental integrity and neurotechnologies
The possibility of neurotechnological interference with our brain and mind raises questions about the moral rights that would protect against the (mis)use of these technologies. One such moral right that has received recent attention is the right to mental integrity. Though the metaphysical boundaries of the mind are a matter of live debate, most defences of this moral right seem to assume an internalist (brain-based) view of the mind. In this ar…
Minding Rights
The rise of neurotechnologies, especially in combination with artificial intelligence (AI)-based methods for brain data analytics, has given rise to concerns around the protection of mental privacy, mental integrity and cognitive liberty – often framed as “neurorights” in ethical, legal, and policy discussions. Several states are now looking at including neurorights into their constitutional legal frameworks, and international institutions and or…
Rethinking the Right to Freedom of Thought
In recent years, there has been increased academic interest in the human right to freedom of thought (RFoT). Scholars from various disciplines are currently debating the content and scope of this right. In his annual thematic report of 2021, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief paid explicit and comprehensive attention to the RFoT, encouraging further clarification of the content and scope of the right. This pape…
Closed-Loop Brain Devices in Offender Rehabilitation
The current debate on closed-loop brain devices (CBDs) mainly focuses on their use in a medical context; possible criminal justice applications have only received incidental scholarly attention. Unlike in medicine, in criminal justice, CBDs might be offered on behalf of the State and for the purpose of protecting security, rather than realizing healthcare aims. It would be possible to deploy CBDs in the rehabilitation of convicted offenders, simi…
Sin obras prominentes en esta página.
Closed-Loop Brain Devices in Offender Rehabilitation
The current debate on closed-loop brain devices (CBDs) mainly focuses on their use in a medical context; possible criminal justice applications have only received incidental scholarly attention. Unlike in medicine, in criminal justice, CBDs might be offered on behalf of the State and for the purpose of protecting security, rather than realizing healthcare aims. It would be possible to deploy CBDs in the rehabilitation of convicted offenders, simi…
Rethinking the Right to Freedom of Thought
In recent years, there has been increased academic interest in the human right to freedom of thought (RFoT). Scholars from various disciplines are currently debating the content and scope of this right. In his annual thematic report of 2021, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief paid explicit and comprehensive attention to the RFoT, encouraging further clarification of the content and scope of the right. This pape…
Minding Rights
The rise of neurotechnologies, especially in combination with artificial intelligence (AI)-based methods for brain data analytics, has given rise to concerns around the protection of mental privacy, mental integrity and cognitive liberty – often framed as “neurorights” in ethical, legal, and policy discussions. Several states are now looking at including neurorights into their constitutional legal frameworks, and international institutions and or…
Right to mental integrity and neurotechnologies
The possibility of neurotechnological interference with our brain and mind raises questions about the moral rights that would protect against the (mis)use of these technologies. One such moral right that has received recent attention is the right to mental integrity. Though the metaphysical boundaries of the mind are a matter of live debate, most defences of this moral right seem to assume an internalist (brain-based) view of the mind. In this ar…
Reconsidering the absolute nature of the right to freedom of thought
The right to freedom of thought (RFoT) is generally considered to imply three substantive freedoms: that inner thoughts shall not be impermissibly altered; that persons shall not be forced to reveal their unmanifested thoughts; and that persons shall not be punished for their thoughts. It is often assumed that the right protects these freedoms in an absolute way. This article challenges the assumption that the RFoT is completely absolute in estab…
Law (5 obras) · Political science (5 obras) · Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (3 obras) · Computer Science (2 obras) · Engineering (2 obras) · Engineering ethics (2 obras) · Epistemology (2 obras) · Human rights (2 obras) · Philosophy (2 obras) · Psychology (2 obras)