Ilse Stuive
Datos Biográficos
| ID | 9252000 |
|---|---|
| NOMBRE | Ilse Stuive |
| NOMBRES | Ilse |
| APELLIDO | Stuive |
| FIRMA | STUIVE I |
| AFILIACIONES | University of Groningen |
| VERIFICADO | No |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 2 |
| TOTAL DE CITAS | 0 |
| TOTAL COMO AUTOR | 2 |
| TOTAL COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMER AÑO DE PUBLICACIÓN | 2008 |
| AÑO MÁS RECIENTE DE PUBLICACIÓN | 2009 |
| ÍNDICE H | 0 |
Comparison of Methods for Adjusting Incorrect Assignments of Items to Subtests
A common question in test evaluation is whether an a priori assignment of items to subtests is supported by empirical data. If the analysis results indicate the assignment of items to subtests under study is not supported by data, the assignment is often adjusted. In this study the authors compare two methods on the quality of their suggestions to adjust incorrect assignments of items to subtests. The confirmatory common factor (CCF) method is of…
The Empirical Verification of an Assignment of Items to Subtests
This study compares two confirmatory factor analysis methods on their ability to verify whether correct assignments of items to subtests are supported by the data. The confirmatory common factor (CCF) method is used most often and defines nonzero loadings so that they correspond to the assignment of items to subtests. Another method is the oblique multiple group (OMG) method, which defines subtests as unweighted sums of the scores on all items as…
Sin obras prominentes en esta página.
The Empirical Verification of an Assignment of Items to Subtests
This study compares two confirmatory factor analysis methods on their ability to verify whether correct assignments of items to subtests are supported by the data. The confirmatory common factor (CCF) method is used most often and defines nonzero loadings so that they correspond to the assignment of items to subtests. Another method is the oblique multiple group (OMG) method, which defines subtests as unweighted sums of the scores on all items as…
Comparison of Methods for Adjusting Incorrect Assignments of Items to Subtests
A common question in test evaluation is whether an a priori assignment of items to subtests is supported by empirical data. If the analysis results indicate the assignment of items to subtests under study is not supported by data, the assignment is often adjusted. In this study the authors compare two methods on the quality of their suggestions to adjust incorrect assignments of items to subtests. The confirmatory common factor (CCF) method is of…
Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques (2 obras) · Computer Science (2 obras) · Mathematics (2 obras) · Psychology (2 obras) · Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (2 obras) · Statistics (2 obras) · A priori and a posteriori (1 obras) · Common-method variance (1 obras) · Confirmatory factor analysis (1 obras) · Correlation (1 obras)