Brietta R Clark
Datos Biográficos
| ID | 9271775 |
|---|---|
| NOMBRE | Brietta R Clark |
| NOMBRES | Brietta R |
| APELLIDO | Clark |
| FIRMA | CLARK B R |
| AFILIACIONES | Loyola Marymount University |
| VERIFICADO | No |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 2 |
| TOTAL DE CITAS | 0 |
| TOTAL COMO AUTOR | 2 |
| TOTAL COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMER AÑO DE PUBLICACIÓN | 2022 |
| AÑO MÁS RECIENTE DE PUBLICACIÓN | 2022 |
| ÍNDICE H | 0 |
Structural Racism In Historical And Modern US Health Care Policy
The COVID-19 pandemic has illuminated and amplified the harsh reality of health inequities experienced by racial and ethnic minority groups in the United States. Members of these groups have disproportionately been infected and died from COVID-19, yet they still lack equitable access to treatment and vaccines. Lack of equitable access to high-quality health care is in large part a result of structural racism in US health care policy, which struct…
Protecting Health after Dobbs
In Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, the Supreme Court eliminated the long‐standing federal constitutional right to abortion. Discussions of Dobbs tend to emphasize the loss of protection for reproductive choice. But Dobbs also eroded protection for a related yet distinctly important interest that served under Roe v. Wade as a check on government regulation of reproduction: the preservation of health. This erasure has opened the door …
Sin obras prominentes en esta página.
Structural Racism In Historical And Modern US Health Care Policy
The COVID-19 pandemic has illuminated and amplified the harsh reality of health inequities experienced by racial and ethnic minority groups in the United States. Members of these groups have disproportionately been infected and died from COVID-19, yet they still lack equitable access to treatment and vaccines. Lack of equitable access to high-quality health care is in large part a result of structural racism in US health care policy, which struct…
Protecting Health after Dobbs
In Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, the Supreme Court eliminated the long‐standing federal constitutional right to abortion. Discussions of Dobbs tend to emphasize the loss of protection for reproductive choice. But Dobbs also eroded protection for a related yet distinctly important interest that served under Roe v. Wade as a check on government regulation of reproduction: the preservation of health. This erasure has opened the door …
Environmental health (2 obras) · Law (2 obras) · Medicine (2 obras) · Political science (2 obras) · Population (2 obras) · Abortion (1 obras) · Context (archaeology) (1 obras) · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) (1 obras) · Disadvantage (1 obras) · Disease (1 obras)