Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Abeezar I Sarela

Datos Biográficos

ID9596376
NOMBREAbeezar I Sarela
NOMBRESAbeezar I
APELLIDOSarela
FIRMASARELA A I
AFILIACIONESLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
ORCID0000-0002-7785-9732
VERIFICADOSí
TOTAL DE OBRAS5
TOTAL DE CITAS0
OBRAS COMO AUTOR5
OBRAS COMO EDITOR0
PRIMER AÑO DE PUBLICACIÓN2022
AÑO MÁS RECIENTE DE PUBLICACIÓN2024
ÍNDICE H0
  • Can medical ethics truly be independent of law

    Abeezar I Sarela•ARTICLE•Journal of Medical Ethics•2024

  • The Supreme Court’s decision in McCulloch v Forth Valley Health Board

    Abeezar I Sarela•ARTICLE•Journal of Medical Ethics•2024

    The UK Supreme Court’s recent judgement in McCulloch v Forth Valley Health Board clarifies the standard for the identification of ‘reasonable’ alternative medical treatments. The required standard is that of a reasonable doctor: treatments that would be accepted as proper by a responsible body of medical opinion. Accordingly, the assessment of consent involves a two-stage test: first, a ‘reasonable doctor’ test for identifying alternative treatme…

  • Deference to patients’ risk attitudes is contingent on medical norms

    Abeezar I Sarela•ARTICLE•Journal of Medical Ethics•2023

  • Does the General Medical Council’s 2020 guidance on consent advance on its 2008 guidance

    Abeezar I Sarela•ARTICLE•Journal of Medical Ethics•2022

    The General Medical Council renewed its guidance on consent in 2020. In this essay, I argue that the 2020 guidance does not advance on the earlier, 2008 guidance in regard to treatments that doctors are obliged to offer to patients. In both, doctors are instructed to not provide treatments that are not in the overall benefit, or clinical interests, of the patient; although, patients are absolutely entitled to decline treatment. As such, consent h…

  • Rawlsian justice in healthcare

    Abeezar I Sarela•ARTICLE•Journal of Medical Ethics•2022

    Cox and Fritz state the central problem as the absence of a framework for healthcare policy decisions; but, they overlook the theoretical underpinnings of public law. In response, they propose a two-step procedure to guide fair decision-making. The first step relies on Thomas Scanlon’s ‘contractualism’ for stakeholders to consider whether, or not, they could reasonably reject policy proposals made by others; then in the second step, John Rawls’s …

Sin obras prominentes en esta página.

  • Does the General Medical Council’s 2020 guidance on consent advance on its 2008 guidance

    Abeezar I Sarela•ARTICLE•Journal of Medical Ethics•2022

    The General Medical Council renewed its guidance on consent in 2020. In this essay, I argue that the 2020 guidance does not advance on the earlier, 2008 guidance in regard to treatments that doctors are obliged to offer to patients. In both, doctors are instructed to not provide treatments that are not in the overall benefit, or clinical interests, of the patient; although, patients are absolutely entitled to decline treatment. As such, consent h…

  • Rawlsian justice in healthcare

    Abeezar I Sarela•ARTICLE•Journal of Medical Ethics•2022

    Cox and Fritz state the central problem as the absence of a framework for healthcare policy decisions; but, they overlook the theoretical underpinnings of public law. In response, they propose a two-step procedure to guide fair decision-making. The first step relies on Thomas Scanlon’s ‘contractualism’ for stakeholders to consider whether, or not, they could reasonably reject policy proposals made by others; then in the second step, John Rawls’s …

  • Deference to patients’ risk attitudes is contingent on medical norms

    Abeezar I Sarela•ARTICLE•Journal of Medical Ethics•2023

  • Can medical ethics truly be independent of law

    Abeezar I Sarela•ARTICLE•Journal of Medical Ethics•2024

  • The Supreme Court’s decision in McCulloch v Forth Valley Health Board

    Abeezar I Sarela•ARTICLE•Journal of Medical Ethics•2024

    The UK Supreme Court’s recent judgement in McCulloch v Forth Valley Health Board clarifies the standard for the identification of ‘reasonable’ alternative medical treatments. The required standard is that of a reasonable doctor: treatments that would be accepted as proper by a responsible body of medical opinion. Accordingly, the assessment of consent involves a two-stage test: first, a ‘reasonable doctor’ test for identifying alternative treatme…

Law (4 obras) · Political science (4 obras) · Computer Science (3 obras) · Ethics in medical practice (3 obras) · Healthcare cost, quality, practices (3 obras) · Psychology (3 obras) · Alternative medicine (2 obras) · Engineering (2 obras) · Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (2 obras) · Health care (2 obras)

Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae