Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Humanitarianism and National Sovereignty

Red Cross Intervention on behalf of Political Prisoners in Soviet Russia, 1921–3

Datos Bibliográficos

ID10073159
AutoresKimberly A Lowe (0000-0002-0272-3531, Lesley University, autor de correspondencia)
Año2014
Volumen49
Número4
Páginas652-674
Fecha de publicación2014-09-03
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaJournal of Contemporary History (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0022-0094 • E-ISSN: 1461-7250
EditorialSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0022009414538471
OpenAlexW2058554695
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas11

From 1921 to 1923 the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) sought to protect the individual rights of political prisoners in Soviet Russia. This action represented the culmination of the Red Cross’ attempt after the First World War to transform the humanitarian rights assured to soldiers by the Geneva and Hague conventions into universal rights for all people. The Red Cross, employing concepts that demonstrate a connection between humanitarianism and human rights, argued for a right to assistance that transcended national sovereignty and authorized international intervention in the sovereign affairs of states. The article traces the ideological origins of this universal humanitarian right through the debates on civil war at the 1912 and 1921 International Conferences of the Red Cross and then analyzes the ICRC's use of private and public channels to protect political prisoners in Soviet Russia. Despite initial international support, the ICRC failed to achieve a humanitarian intervention from the former Allied powers at the Genoa Conference in 1922. As a result the movement retreated to a more conservative stance regarding the role of humanitarianism vis-a-vis the nation-state, a stance it maintained with tragic consequences through the 1930s and into the Second World War

Human rights · Humanitarian intervention · Ideology · Intervention (counseling · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Sovereign state · Sovereignty · State (computer science · Communism, Protests, Social Movements · French Historical and Cultural Studies · Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics · Law

  • I Reserve the Right to Criticize My Friends”

    Open Access•Steven Finkel•International Review of Social…•2023

  • The Images of China and Britain in the Syrian Media

    Hengrui Ding, Degang Sun•Contemporary Arab Affairs•2021

  • Humanitarianisms in context

    Open Access•Kevin O’sullivan, Kevin O'Sullivan et al.•European Review of History Revue…•2016

  • No Happy Childhood Behind the Iron Curtain

    Rosaria Franco•Europe Asia Studies•2020

  • The Dangers of ‘Going Native’

    Open Access•Francesca Piana•Contemporary European History•2016

  • Failing to Create Revolutionaries

    Open Access•Peter Whitewood•Revolutionary Russia•2022

  • The Great Humanitarian”

    Open Access•Boyd Van Dijk•Law and History Review•2019

  • Word War I and the humanitarian impulse

    William I Hitchcock•The Tocqueville Review/La revue…•2014

  • Human Rights in War

    Open Access•Boyd Van Dijk•American Journal of International…•2018

  • Navigating the profits and pitfalls of governmental partnerships

    Open Access•Kimberly A Lowe•Disasters•2015

  • The "Political Red Cross" and the Genealogy of Rights Discourse in Revolutionary Russia

    Steven Finkel, Stuart Finkel•The Journal of Modern History•2017

Obras citantes distintas11
Citas por año0,92
Intervalo de citas2014 - 2023 (10)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 11
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae