The Calling of the Barebones Parliament Reconsidered
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 10078810 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Tai Liu (0000-0002-4057-8435, University of Delaware, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 1971 |
| Volumen | 22 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 223-236 |
| Fecha de publicación | 1971-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | The Journal of Ecclesiastical History (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0022-0469 • E-ISSN: 1469-7637 |
| Editorial | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0022046900058334 |
| OpenAlex | W2164248829 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 3 |
The Barebones Parliament occupies a unique place in the parliamentary history of England. It is probably the only parliament in English history whose members were not chosen by the electorate. Unlike other English parliaments, its members were selected by Cromwell and his Council of Officers and selected, in the main, from the Congregational communities in the nation. According to the principle professed at the time, they were chosen not because of their estates, their family connexions or their political patrons, but rather because of their reputation as ‘men of integrity, fearing God and hating covetousness’.Although the Barebones Parliament turned out to be a failure, with little or almost nothing accomplished after a short but tempestuous session, it was none the less important as a political experiment in Puritan utopianism
Epistemology · Nothing · Parliament · Political science · Politics · Reputation · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law · Philosophy
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |