American Economic Expertise from the Great War to the Cold War
Some Initial Observations
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 10100639 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Michael André Bernstein (0000-0002-8028-0561, National Humanities Center, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 1990 |
| Volumen | 50 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 407-416 |
| Fecha de publicación | 1990-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | The Journal of Economic History (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0022-0507 • E-ISSN: 1471-6372 |
| Editorial | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0022050700036524 |
| OpenAlex | W2161488437 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 3 |
| Referencias citadas | 10 |
The twentieth-century American economics profession was privileged and shaped by the federal government's need to direct resources and to call on experts. Bureaucratic tendencies to classify and count had an impact on the discipline's self-concept, subdisciplines, and multiple research agendas. A consensus of professional opinion and the standardization of graduate curriculums emerged out of the involvement of economists with governmental affairs. Moreover, American economists played an important role in the reconstitution of the profession overseas after World War II
Bureaucracy · Cold war · Curriculum · Government (linguistics · Political economy · Political science · Sociology · Standardization · World War II · Economic Theory and Institutions · Law · Public Administration
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,09 |
| Intervalo de citas | 1993 - 2022 (30) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 3 |