Inhibition of Return and the Attentional Set for Integrating Versus Differentiating Information

Datos Bibliográficos

ID10121901
AutoresJ Lupiáñez (0000-0001-6157-9894, Universidad de Granada, autor de correspondencia), Bruce Milliken (0009-0008-8695-0387, McMaster University)
Año1999
Volumen126
Número4
Páginas392-418
Fecha de publicación1999-10-01
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaThe Journal of General Psychology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0022-1309 • E-ISSN: 1940-0888
EditorialTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/00221309909595373
PMID10555867
OpenAlexW1973077865
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas6
Referencias citadas41

Cuing a location with an uninformative cue leads to a facilitatory effect at that location shortly afterward and later (about 300 ms) to a negative effect called inhibition of return (IOR). Until recently, it was argued that IOR occurs in detection and localization tasks, but not in discrimination tasks. However, the authors of several recent studies have demonstrated IOR effects in discrimination tasks, although at a later cue-to-target stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA). In this study, the authors examined why IOR occurs at a later SOA in discrimination tasks. In Experiments 1 and 2, different time courses of exogenous cuing effects in detection and discrimination tasks were established. In Experiment 3, the authors examined the role of an attentional set on the time course of exogenous cuing effects by manipulating the proportion of trials in which a distractor is presented in the location opposite the target. A new framework for understanding exogenous cuing effects and their dependence on endogenous attention is proposed

Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Inhibition of return · Set (abstract data type · Visual attention · Computer Science · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies · Neuroscience · Psychology · Visual perception and processing mechanisms

Herramientas

Abrir DOISci-Hub