The relationship between discrimination and memory for spacing and feature changes in houses

Adults need to discriminate between stimuli and recognize those previously seen. For faces, feature changes (e.g., different eyes) and spacing changes (e.g., distances between eyes) are important cues. In two experiments, we assessed the influence of these on discrimination and recognition of houses, a commonly used control in face studies. In both experiments, discrimination was better for feature than spacing changes. Memory for spacing changes was generally poor but aided by extra learning and intermixing change types. Conversely, memory for features was good, especially when there were few houses, and change type was blocked. Unexpectedly, memory was best for differences that might signal something about occupants (e.g., changes to garden or bins), perhaps akin to hairstyles for faces. Overall, results are consistent with previous work showing poor discrimination of spacing in non-face objects and extends them to show that, unlike for faces, spacing differences are also not well remembered

Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Face (sociological concept · Feature (linguistics · Recognition memory · Sociology · Face recognition and analysis · Face Recognition and Perception · Neuroscience · Psychology · Visual Attention and Saliency Detection

• Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition

  Open Access•James W Tanaka, Martha J Farah•Quarterly Journal of Experimental…•1993

  Añadir item

• Why faces are and are not special

  Rhea Diamond, Susan Carey•Journal of Experimental…•1986

  Añadir item

• PsyScope

  Open Access•Jonathan Cohen, Brian Macwhinney et al.•Behavior Research Methods,…•1993

  Añadir item

• Face-specific configural processing of relational information

  Open Access•Helmut Leder, Claus-Christian Carbon et al.•British Journal of Psychology•2006

  Añadir item