How to Define Sahabhūhetu
Rethinking Saṃghabhadra’s Use of the Concept of Common Effects
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 10126433 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Jincheng Li (0000-0002-0558-774X, Chinese University of Hong Kong, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2025 |
| Volumen | 54 |
| Número | 1 |
| Páginas | 95-118 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2025-12-10 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Journal of Indian Philosophy (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0022-1791 • E-ISSN: 1573-0395 |
| Editorial | Springer Nature (PUBLISHER • SG) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10781-025-09629-4 |
| OpenAlex | W4417180598 |
| Idioma | EN |
The co-existent cause ( sahabhūhetu ) is a type of cause proposed by the Sarvāstivāda school, which arises simultaneously with its effects. However, there is significant disagreement on how define a dharma as the co-existent cause of its effects. One of the central debates revolves around how to interpret the common effects ( *ekaphala ) criterion employed by the Vaibhāṣikas, especially Saṃghabhadra, to define the co-existent cause. Previous studies have largely overlooked Saṃghabhadra’s nuanced application of the concept of common effects when discussing specific cases, leading to various misunderstandings. In this article, I begin by analyzing two main scenarios in which Saṃghabhadra applies the concept in question, identifying two distinct usages: common subsequent effects and common simultaneous effects. I then propose an integrated understanding, according to which Saṃghabhadra in fact maintains that if a dharma is the co-existent cause of another by virtue of satisfying the common effects criterion, it must share both common subsequent effects and common simultaneous effects with that dharma . On this interpretation, all cases in which Saṃghabhadra explicitly applies the common effects criterion to define co-existent causes can be coherently explained and no counterexamples arise under this understanding. Finally, I extend this understanding to the third scenario and demonstrate its coherence in that context as well
Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy · Common cause and special cause · Common knowledge (logic · Context (archaeology · Counterexample · Virtue · Indian and Buddhist Studies · Indian History and Philosophy · South Asian Studies and Diaspora
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |