Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Vasectomy, ovulation suppressors, and sexual behavior∗

Datos Bibliográficos

ID10210865
AutoresFrederick J Ziegler (autor de correspondencia), David A Rodgers, David Rodgers
Año1968
Volumen4
Número3
Páginas169-193
Fecha de publicación1968-08-01
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaThe Journal of Sex Research (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0022-4499 • E-ISSN: 1559-8519
EditorialTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/00224496809550569
OpenAlexW2055401555
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas1
Referencias citadas6

41 couples who decided to use vasectomy as a contraceptive means (V group) and 23 couples who decided to use contraceptive pills (P group) were extensively interviewed and completed questionnaires about their sexual behavior before and after adopting these contraceptive means. Participants were predominantly middle and upper-middle class young to middle-aged white Americans. Wives and husbands were interviewed separately. The V group was somewhat older (p less than .05 for ages of husbands ages of wives and years married) and had more children (p less than .01). Noncoital contraception tended to reduce the inverse relation between age and frequency of intercourse especially in the V group. The data infer that effective contraception can result in more frequent sexual experiences in couples markedly fearful of pregnancy but the data show no dramatic increase in coitus frequency. The P groups data indicates noncoital contraception brings with it no inevitable dissatisfaction with rate of intercourse. The V group experienced the greatest reaction to change of contraceptive procedure though these favorable and unfavorable changes could have resulted from differences in personality from the P group. In both P and V groups noncoital orgastic techniques were reported at least as frequently after the new procedure as before. Both of the methods could have contributed to increased incidences of male impotence but the number of respondents was too small for even tentative conclusions. The methods seemed to have no effect on female frigidity. Extramarital sexual activity showed no increase with either method

Environmental health · Family planning · Gynecology · Hormone · Obstetrics · Ovulation · Population · Research methodology · Sexual behavior · Vasectomy · Internal Medicine · Male Reproductive Health Studies · Medicine · Psychology · Reproductive Health and Technologies · Sexual function and dysfunction studies · Social Psychology

  • A follow‐up study of the effects of vasectomy on sexual behavior

    M Freund, Joseph E Davis•The Journal of Sex Research•1973

  • Effect of Vasectomy on Psychological Functioning

    Frederick J Ziegler, David A Rodgers et al.•Psychosomatic Medicine•1966

  • Sociopsychological Characteristics of Patients Obtaining Vasectomies from Urologists

    David A Rodgers, David Rodgers et al.•Marriage and Family Living•1963

  • Comparisons of nine contraceptive procedures by couples changing to vasectomy or ovulation Suppression Medication 1

    David A Rodgers, David Rodgers et al.•The Journal of Sex Research•1965

  • Research in Family Planning

    Norma Mcarthur, Clyde V Kiser•Pacific Affairs•1963

  • A Longitudinal Study of the Psycho-Social Effects of Vasectomy

    David A Rodgers, David Rodgers et al.•Journal of Marriage and the Family•1965

Citas por año0,02
Intervalo de citas1973 - 1973 (1)
Altamente citadoNo

Herramientas

Abrir DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae