Studies of Japan, Area Studies, and the Challenges of Social Theory
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 10295224 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Ian Reader (autor de correspondencia), S N Eisenstadt, Johann P Arnason (0000-0002-2320-5346), John Clammer (0000-0003-3222-9582) |
| Año | 1998 |
| Volumen | 53 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 237-237 |
| Fecha de publicación | 1998-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Monumenta Nipponica (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0027-0741 • E-ISSN: 1880-1390 |
| Editorial | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2385677 |
| OpenAlex | W570904434 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 3 |
| Referencias citadas | 2 |
I N a recent discussion H. D. Harootunian and Sakai Naoki expressed some withering criticisms of area studies, predominantly focusing their firepower on the field of Japanology and Japanese studies (Nihon kenkyt).1 They argue, inter alia, that this field is devoid of theoretical perspectives and methodological bases, and that scholars in it have failed to come to grips with-or even make an attempt to understand the relevance of-theoretical developments such as postmodernism, critical theory, and poststructuralism that have occupied an important place in academic debates in other fields of
Epistemology · Field (mathematics · Political science · Postmodernism · Relevance (law · Social science · Social theory · Sociology · Japanese History and Culture · Law · Philosophy
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,23 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2013 - 2022 (10) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 3 |