Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Deliberation, Citizen Science and Covid‐19

Datos Bibliográficos

ID10358193
AutoresHarry Pearse (0000-0002-8887-441X, autor de correspondencia)
Año2020
Volumen91
Número3
Páginas571-577
Fecha de publicación2020-06-27
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaThe Political Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0032-3179 • E-ISSN: 1467-923X
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/1467-923x.12869
PMID32836410
OpenAlexW3037025895
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas15

Rather than aiming to produce more 'rational' or more 'other-regarding' citizen judgements (the outcome of which is uncertain), deliberative democratic exercises should be re-designed to maximise democratic participation. To do this, they must involve citizens and experts, a novel arrangement that will benefit both cohorts. For the former, a more inclusive form of deliberation will offer an opportunity to contribute to political discussion and be listened to by people with political or policy-based authority. For the latter, it will provide a venue through which expertise can be brought to bear on democratic decision making without risk of scapegoating or politicisation. More broadly, deliberation that prioritises dialogue (over, say, opinion change) affirms the principle that political decisions reflect value judgements rather than technically 'right' or technically 'wrong' answers-judgements that are legitimate if arrived at through discussion involving the people due to be affected by the resultant policy. This article sets out the advantages of this form of deliberation-which bears some similarity to certain types of citizen science-in the context of the UK government's responses to Covid-19; both the confused decision making evident to date, and the forthcoming re-opening phases that will prioritise or advantage some constituencies over others

Context (archaeology · Deliberation · Deliberative democracy · Democracy · Government (linguistics · Law and economics · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Scapegoating · Sociology · Value (mathematics · Computer Science · COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing · COVID-19 epidemiological studies · Law · Public Administration · Zoonotic diseases and public health

  • Politics of Expertise and Blame during Covid-19 Quarantine in Chile

    Open Access•Kelly Bauer, Claudio Villalobos et al.•Middle Atlantic Review of Latin…•2021

  • Qualitative comparative analysis of policies implemented by 26 European countries during the 2020 great lockdown

    Open Access•Zhipeng Wang, Zhi‐Peng Wang et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2024

  • The Covid-19 Crisis and the Case for Online GeoParticipation in Spatial Planning

    Open Access•Jiří Pánek, Enzo Falco et al.•ISPRS International Journal of…•2022

  • Introducing the Journal of Deliberative Democracy

    Open Access•Nicole Curato, André Bächtiger et al.•Journal of Deliberative Democracy•2020

  • Community perceptions of citizen science approach in pandemic preparedness and response in South and Southeast Asian countries

    Open Access•Dinesh Kumar, Ingo Hauter et al.•PLOS Global Public Health•2025

  • Citizen's preferences for urban planning priorities

    Open Access•Kerstin K Zander, Griffin Hill et al.•Cities•2025

  • Communicating Solidarity? Public Responses to UK Government Communication of Covid-19

    Open Access•Giles Mo, Nely Konstantinova•Representation•2023

  • Understanding the social–ecological systems of non-state seafood sustainability scheme in the blue economy

    Open Access•Isa Olalekan Elegbede, Kafayat Adetoun Fakoya et al.•Environment Development and…•2023

  • Deliberation under the circumstances of acute crises

    Open Access•Mikko Värttö, Mikko Leino•Critical Policy Studies•2025

  • Covid and Climate

    Open Access•Reiner Grundmann•Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews…•2021

  • The challenges of providing certainty in the face of wicked problems

    Open Access•Darren G Lilleker, Thomas Stoeckle•Journal of Public Affairs•2021

  • Does public justification face an ‘expert problem’? Some thoughts in light of the Covid-19 pandemic

    Open Access•Andrew Reid•Critical Review of International…•2024

  • Advancing Robust Governance in Turbulent Times

    Open Access•Jacob Torfing, Tina Øllgaard Bentzen et al.•Public Administration•2025

  • Citizen Observations as Legal Obligations

    Open Access•Dick Kasperowski, Jesse Peterson et al.•Science Technology & Human Values•2024

  • Deliberación pública en el marco de la respuesta a la pandemia por Covid-19

    Open Access•Karol Cotes Cantillo, Juan Carlos Eslava Castañeda et al.•Saúde em Debate•2023

Obras citantes distintas15
Citas por año2,5
Intervalo de citas2020 - 2025 (6)
Velocidad de citaciónrecent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 15
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae