Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Assessing Futures Intelligence

Looking Back on Global Trends 2025

Datos Bibliográficos

ID10372003
AutoresJames J Wirtz (0000-0003-2184-0239, Naval War College), Roger Z George (Georgetown University)
Año2022
Volumen137
Número3
Páginas481-510
Fecha de publicación2022-01-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaPolitical Science Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0032-3195 • E-ISSN: 1538-165X
EditorialOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1002/polq.13354
OpenAlexW4281694007
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas2

IN THE FALL OF 1996, the U.S. National Intelligence Council (NIC) launched an initiative to identify and assess key global trends with an eye toward describing their impact on world politics, regional affairs, and U.S. security interests. The product of a series of meetings involving government and nongovernment experts, the forecast was initially intended for a limited audience. However, the report generated so much interest that it was distributed publicly in 1997 under the title Global Trends 2010.1 A new unclassified U.S. intelligence product—futures intelligence—was born. That assessment has since been renewed at about four-year intervals by the NIC, culminating in its seventh reincarnation, Global Trends 2040, which was published online in March 2021.2 Despite the effort to develop futures intelligence and a growing literature dealing with the study of the future,3 intelligence scholars and practitioners have spent relatively little time identifying the factors that enable accurate estimates and forecasts, the factors that cause mistakes, and the reasons why some important developments escape notice altogether in futures intelligence.4 By contrast, critics usually charge that futures intelligence just projects today's headlines and hot topics onto the future. It is not particularly surprising, for example, that Global Trends 2040 depicts a world in which an intensification of today's internet-enabled social turmoil might destabilize existing governments and other institutions. Written during a pandemic, it is the gloomiest Global Trends assessment produced by the U.S. intelligence community.5

Art history · Citation · Economics · Financial economics · Futures contract · George (robot · Political science · Competitive and Knowledge Intelligence · History · Law

  • Diffuse intelligence

    Open Access•James J Wirtz•Intelligence & National Security•2026

  • Toward a futurist approach to hedging strategy in Southeast Asia

    Open Access•Pak Nung Wong•Frontiers in Political Science•2025

Obras citantes distintas2
Citas por año2
Intervalo de citas2025 - 2026 (2)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 2
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae