Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

A Manchurian Candidate? The GOP’s Discourse on the Russian War in Ukraine

Datos Bibliográficos

ID10383632
AutoresEva Rieger (0000-0002-9218-7620, autor de correspondencia)
Año2024
Volumen66
Número1
Páginas77-99
Fecha de publicación2024-08-20
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaPolitische Vierteljahresschrift. Sonderheft (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0720-4809 • E-ISSN: 1862-2860
EditorialSpringer VS (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1007/s11615-024-00558-7
OpenAlexW4401975830
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas1
Referencias citadas20

The United States has a longstanding tradition regarding its overall foreign policy, in the form of a bipartisan consensus. This includes—among other things—maintaining alliances and curbing the influence of rivals (e.g., Russia). Since this consensus has been in place, traditionally the Republican Party (GOP) has been especially intent on a less cooperative and more containing or deterring stance towards Russia. With former U.S. President Donald Trump, we can see a turning point in this behaviour by the GOP. Trump’s obvious admiration for Russian president Putin and his statements about Putin being overly favourable, while simultaneously questioning NATO and the United States’ commitment to defend Eastern European partners, show a distinctive shift in the GOP’s discourse. This renunciation has subsequently been picked up by parts of the Republican Party, rendering the bipartisan consensus a contested issue. The full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 now constitutes an important external shock influencing said discursive shift. By drawing on discourse-bound identity theory and discourse analysis, the GOP’s discourse regarding Russia and NATO is expected to have (substantially) changed in a kind of Zeitenwende —back towards the bipartisan consensus. This article will, therefore, analyse the statements of prominent Republicans after the Russian invasion, compare them to Trump’s positions on these issues, and identify whether the invasion serves as a formative event that creates an overall shift in rhetoric and positions

Art · Humanities · Political science · European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics

  • From Stability to Escalation

    Open Access•Tănase Tasențe, Mihaela Rus et al.•Social Sciences•2026

  • The prevalence of bipartisanship in U.S. foreign policy

    Open Access•James D Bryan, Jordan Tama•International Politics•2021

  • Congressional polarization and limitation riders in foreign aid appropriations

    Open Access•Shannon P Carcelli•International Politics•2021

  • Brakeman or booster? Presidents, ideological polarization, reciprocity, and the politics of US arms control

    Open Access•Florian Böller•International Politics•2021

  • Foreign policy free agents

    Open Access•Patrick Homan, Jeffrey S Lantis•International Politics•2022

  • Are we drowning at the water’s edge? Foreign policy polarization among the US Public

    Open Access•Dina Smeltz•International Politics•2022

  • Polarization and US foreign policy

    Open Access•Gordon M Friedrichs, Jordan Tama•International Politics•2022

  • Beyond party

    Open Access•William Bendix, Gyung-Ho Jeong•International Politics•2022

  • Finding the water’s edge

    Open Access•Sarah Maxey•International Politics•2021

  • Trump’s foreign policy and Nato

    Open Access•James Sperling, Mark Webber•Review of International Studies•2019

  • Vandenberg Vanished

    Open Access•Florian Böller•Parliamentary Affairs•2022

  • The Myth of Responsibility

    Open Access•Pauline Augsten, Sebastian Glassner et al.•Global Studies Quarterly•2021

  • The Study of Discourse in International Relations

    Open Access•Jennifer Milliken•European Journal of International…•1999

Obras citantes distintas1
Citas por año1
Intervalo de citas2026 - 2026 (1)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 1

Herramientas

Abrir DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae