Dmitrii Medvedev's Commission Against the Falsification of History
Why Was It Created and What Did It Achieve? A Reassessment
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 10516111 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Pål Kolstø (0000-0002-2745-4198, autor de correspondencia), Kolstø Kolstø |
| Año | 2019 |
| Volumen | 97 |
| Número | 4 |
| Páginas | 738-738 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2019-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | The Slavonic and East European Review (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0037-6795 • E-ISSN: 2222-4327 |
| Editorial | Maney Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.5699/slaveasteurorev2.97.4.0738 |
| OpenAlex | W2978291676 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 3 |
| Referencias citadas | 3 |
In spring 2009, three initiatives were taken in Moscow to control public presentation of Russian history: two bills were prepared for the Duma that would criminalize ‘the rehabilitation of Nazism’ and shortly afterwards President Dmitrii Medvedev established a commission, mandated to ‘counteract attempts to falsify history to the detriment of the interests of Russia.’ The article examines why President Medvedev felt it necessary to establish such a commission, how the commission was composed and worked, and what it achieved. While the Duma bills and the commission have usually been treated as initiatives that pulled in the same direction, I argue that they were fundamentally at odds with each other. In my interpretation, the commission was intended not to promote but to obstruct the passing of the new laws
Commission · Interpretation (philosophy · Nazism · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Eastern European Communism and Reforms · Law · Philosophy · Political Conflict and Governance · Soviet and Russian History
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,43 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2019 - 2021 (3) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 3 |