Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Agricultural Biotechnology in C entral and E astern E urope

Determinants of Cultivation Bans

Datos Bibliográficos

ID10559777
AutoresJ Tosun (0000-0001-9367-5039, Institute of Political Science University of Heidelberg Bergheimer Straße 58 69115 Heidelberg Germany, autor de correspondencia)
Año2014
Volumen54
Número3
Páginas362-381
Fecha de publicación2014-04-10
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaSociologia Ruralis (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0038-0199 • E-ISSN: 1467-9523
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/soru.12046
OpenAlexW1511574982
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas14
Referencias citadas50

By the joining of the E uropean U nion ( EU ), the C entral and E astern E uropean states had to align their agricultural biotechnology regulations to EU standards. In some cases, this meant the adoption of stricter regulations such as for the co‐existence of genetically modified organisms ( GMOs ) and conventional crops. In other cases, harmonisation with EU rules entailed the need to give up more restrictive national regulation, for example: to allow the cultivation of a limited number of GMOs . This article examines why some C entral and E astern E uropean states joined the group of W estern E uropean countries that instituted bans on the commercial cultivation of GMOs in the EU . This study contributes to the literature in two ways. First, it contends that the prohibition of the commercial cultivation of GMOs in some C entral and E astern E uropean member states must be interpreted in light of the EU ‐wide public and political contestation of GMOs . Second, this piece of research shows that the ideological composition of governments matters in explaining the regulation of agricultural biotechnology. This second contribution allows for going beyond the predominant focus on public opinion when analysing the regulation of GMOs in the EU

Agricultural biotechnology · Agricultural science · Agriculture · Biology · Business · European union · Ideology · International trade · Member states · Political science · Politics · Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development · Biotechnology · Ecology · Genetically Modified Organisms Research · Law · Organic Food and Agriculture

  • Greener governments

    Justin Leinaweaver, Rob Thomson et al.•Environmental Politics•2016

  • Who catches the biotech train? Understanding diverging political responses to GMOs in Southeast Asia

    Tomas Larsson•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2016

  • Rival Regulatory Regimes in International Environmental Politics

    Open Access•Kai Schulze, J Tosun•Public Administration•2015

  • The effectiveness of Green voices in parliaments

    Open Access•Paulo Mourão, Paulo Reis Mourão•Environment Development and…•2019

  • The rise and fall of GMOs in politics

    Jakob Schwörer, Xavier Romero-Vidal et al.•Environmental Sociology•2022

  • Support for Policies on Entrepreneurship and Self‐Employment among Parties and Coalition Governments

    Open Access•Marc Debus, J Tosun et al.•Politics & Policy•2017

  • Determinants of Firm‐Level Lobbying and Government Responsiveness in Agricultural Biotechnology in China

    Open Access•Haiyan Deng, Ruifa Hu et al.•Review of Policy Research•2019

  • GMO-free regions in Europe

    J Tosun, Susumu Shikano•Journal of Risk Research•2015

  • Domestic politics and the diffusion of international policy innovations

    Open Access•Sophie Biesenbender, J Tosun•Global Environmental Change•2014

  • Livestock farmers’ perceptions towards genetically engineered methods and genetically modified organisms in Denmark and Sweden

    Open Access•Sevasti Chatzopoulou, Stavros Chatzopoulos•Journal of Rural Studies•2024

  • Personal Characteristics of MPs and Legislative Behavior in Moral Policymaking

    Open Access•Markus Baumanns, Marc Debus et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2015

  • Why Parties Take Neutral Positions on Policy Issues

    U Hartung•German Politics•2020

  • Regulation vs Symbolic Policy-Making

    U Hartung, Felix Hörisch•German Politics•2018

  • Partisanship, Ministers, and Biotechnology Policy

    Open Access•Hanna Bäck, Marc Debus et al.•Review of Policy Research•2015

  • Eco-Nationalism

    Jane I Dawson•Eco-Nationalism•1996

  • When Cooperation Fails

    Mark A Pollack, Gary Shaffer et al.•When cooperation fails•2009

  • Europeanization and Regionalization in the EU’s Enlargement to Central and Eastern Europe

    Open Access•James Hughes, Gwendolyn Sasse et al.•Europeanization and Regionalization…•2005

  • Consensual Nimbys, Contentious Niabys

    Open Access•Franz Seifert•Sociologia Ruralis•2009

  • Risk Regulation in Europe

    Open Access•J Tosun•Risk Regulation in Europe•2013

  • Public Opinion, Risk Assessment, and Biotechnology

    Open Access•Jerome S Legge, Robert F Durant•Review of Policy Research•2010

  • Austria

    HelgeFranz Torgersen, HelgeFranz Torgersen HelgeFranz Torgersen et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2000

  • Genetically modified crops in the European Union

    L Levidow, Susan Carr et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2000

  • Two paths of risk regulation

    Daniela Winkler•Journal of Risk Research•2013

  • Europeanisation Before and After Accession

    Arista Maria Cirtautas, Frank Schimmelfennig•Europe Asia Studies•2010

  • Deference to Scientific Authority Among a Low Information Public

    Dominique Brossard, Matthew C Nisbet•International Journal of Public…•2006

  • Segregating GM Crops

    L Levidow, Karin Boschert•Science as Culture•2011

  • Why Public Participation in Risk Regulation? The Case of Authorizing GMO Products in the European Union

    Maria Paola Ferretti•Science as Culture•2007

  • The Occupation of Beauty”

    Open Access•Katrina Z S Schwartz•East European Politics and…•2007

  • Competitive Governance and the Quest for Legitimacy in the EU

    Yves Tiberghien•Journal of European Integration•2009

  • Green, Black and Brown

    David J Galbreath, Daunis Auers•Journal of Baltic Studies•2009

  • Religious Values and Environmental Concern

    Open Access•Anders Biel, Andréas Nilsson•Social Science Quarterly•2005

  • Knowledge, Food and Place. A Way of Producing, a Way of Knowing

    Open Access•María Fonte•Sociologia Ruralis•2008

  • Rural Society, Social Inclusion and Landscape Change in Central and Eastern Europe

    Open Access•Simon Bell, Alicia Montarzino et al.•Sociologia Ruralis•2009

  • Maps from Space

    Open Access•Guntra A Aistara•Sociologia Ruralis•2009

  • Political parties in Western democracies

    David Childs•International Affairs•1986

  • Coexistence or contradiction? GM crops versus alternative agricultures in Europe

    Open Access•L Levidow, Karin Boschert•Geoforum•2007

  • Transnational Politics of the Environment

    Open Access•Jonathan E Golub, Jonathan Golub•Perspectives on Politics•2005

  • Political Institutions and Policy Performance

    Open Access•Detlef Jahn, Ferdinand Müller-Rommel et al.•Journal of Public Policy•2010

  • Legitimacy and/or policy effectiveness

    Grace Skogstad•Journal of European Public Policy•2003

  • The New Member States of the Eu in the Aftermath of Enlargement

    Антоанета Димитрова, Antoaneta L Dimitrova•Journal of European Public Policy•2010

  • Caving in or sitting it out? Longitudinal patterns of non-compliance in the European Union

    Tanja A Börzel, Tobias Hofmann et al.•Journal of European Public Policy•2012

  • Contested Accountability Claims and GMO Regulation in the European Union

    Open Access•Grace Skogstad•JCMS Journal of Common Market…•2011

  • Embracing European Law

    Open Access•Dimiter Toshkov•European Union Politics•2008

  • Cleavages, competition and coalition‐building

    Open Access•Agnes Batory, Nick Sitter•European Journal of Political…•2004

  • The so-called ‘moratorium’ on the licensing of new genetically modified (GM) products by the European Union 1998–2004

    Sarah Lieberman, Tim Gray•Environmental Politics•2006

  • Policy Responsiveness in Post-communist Europe

    Open Access•Andrew Roberts, Byung-Yeon Kim et al.•British Journal of Political…•2011

  • Government Status and Legislative Behaviour

    Open Access•Steffen Ganghof, Thomas Bräuninger•Party Politics•2006

  • Why Is There No Christian Democracy in Poland — and Why Should We Care

    Open Access•Tim Bale, Aleks Szczerbiak•Party Politics•2008

  • How the Eu Handles Uncertain Risks

    J Tosun•Journal of European Public Policy•2013

  • The International Diffusion of Public-Sector Downsizing

    Chang Kil Lee, David Strang•International Organization•2006

  • A New Spatial Theory of Party Competition

    Open Access•Ian Budge•British Journal of Political…•1994

  • The Party Family and Its Study

    Peter Mair, Cas Mudde•Annual Review of Political Science•1998

  • GM Plants, Farmers and the Public - A Harmonious Relation

    Open Access•Jesper Lassen, Peter Sandøe•Sociologia Ruralis•2009

  • The Third Food Regime

    Open Access•Gabriela Pechlaner, G Otero•Sociologia Ruralis•2008

  • From Streets to Suites

    Open Access•Klaus Weber, H Rao et al.•American Sociological Review•2009

  • Understanding Relations between Science, Politics, and the Public

    Open Access•Michiel P M M De Krom, Joost Dessein et al.•Sociologia Ruralis•2014

  • The curious case of the Latvian Greens

    Daunis Auers•Environmental Politics•2012

  • Leader, a New Social Order, and the Central- and East-European Countries

    Open Access•Imre Kovách•Sociologia Ruralis•2000

Obras citantes distintas14
Citas por año1,17
Intervalo de citas2014 - 2024 (11)
Velocidad de citaciónrecent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 13
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae