Wittgenstein's Early Philosophy
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 10690177 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Sanford Shieh (0000-0002-0307-5310, Texas Wesleyan University, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2015 |
| Volumen | 65 |
| Número | 259 |
| Páginas | 304-307 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2015-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | The Philosophical Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0031-8094 • E-ISSN: 1467-9213 |
| Editorial | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/pq/pqu070 |
| OpenAlex | W2327151237 |
| Idioma | EN |
The recent Tractatus Wars appeared to have been fought over the nature of nonsense and Wittgensteinian methodology, leaving the Tractatus itself largely unscathed. In the present volume of post-War studies, the text of the Tractatus and its philosophical–historical contexts have mostly regained the centre of attention. Roughly, a third of the volume focus solely on the influence of Russell and Frege, especially on how Russell's struggles with his multiple-relation theories of judgement lead to salient features of the Tractatus. The core idea of the multiple-relation theory is that in making a judgement a thinker is related not to a single entity (a proposition) constituted by a relation relating various terms, but to those terms and that relation. The theory notoriously runs into trouble with some apparently non-negotiable features of judgement: (a) a judgement represents not a mere list of entities but a combination of them, (b) judgements cannot represent certain combination of entities at all, e.g., a combination of two relations, (c) certain entities can be represented as combined in more than one way, e.g., two terms and an asymmetrical relation, and (d) in general a judgement may be true or be false.
Epistemology · Focus (optics) · Judgement · Nonsense · Proposition · Relation (database) · Computer Science · Philosophy · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education · Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |