Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Descartes on Unknown Faculties and Our Knowledge of the External World

Datos Bibliográficos

ID10697850
AutoresLex Newman (autor de correspondencia)
Año1994
Volumen103
Número3
Páginas489
Fecha de publicación1994-07-01
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaThe Philosophical Review (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0031-8108 • E-ISSN: 1558-1470
EditorialJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/2185790
OpenAlexW2326720157
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas3

Descartes introduces his skeptical arguments, in the First Meditation, in an order of increasing strength. First, the narrator-meditator notices that judgments concerning the nature of small and distant objects are unreliable; later, that even sensory judgments about large and close objects are in doubt-this after considering an argument related to madness and another related to dreaming; finally, that no judgments resist doubt-the renowned Deceiver Hypothesis is introduced, a skeptical device intended to undermine not only the judgment that an external, corporeal world exists, but even the most certain judgments in mathematics.' For each of these skeptical problems (with the exception of the madness worry), Descartes provides an argument in the later (epistemologically constructive) Meditations that is its complement. He provides an argument that our sensory ideas of corporeal things do not resemble the external objects that cause them (regardless of size and distance); an argument intended to solve the problem of dreaming; another to prove the existence of the external, corporeal world; and an argument to establish the veracity of judgments based on clear and distinct perception. In this paper, I focus on the complementary pair that concerns the problem of the existence of the external, corporeal world. According to (what I shall call) the standard interpretation, the problem is generated only by the strongest of the First Meditation skeptical arguments, the Deceiver Hypothesis;2 it is then dismissed in

Analytic philosophy · Contemporary philosophy · Epistemology · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Historical Philosophy and Science · History of Science and Medicine · Philosophy

  • Herbert of Cherbury, Descartes and Locke on Innate Ideas and Universal Consent

    Open Access•Mattia Mantovani, Zeta Books•Journal of Early Modern Studies•2019

  • Defense of a Libertarian Interpretation of Descartes' Account of Judgment 1

    Open Access•Lex Newman•Pacific philosophical quarterly•2023

  • Ideas, Pictures, and the Directness of Perception in Descartes and Locke

    Open Access•Lex Newman•Philosophy Compass•2009

Citas por año0,18
Intervalo de citas2009 - 2023 (15)
Altamente citadoNo

Herramientas

Abrir DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae