Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

The Logic of Explanation in Malinowskian Anthropology

Datos Bibliográficos

ID10705014
AutoresLeon J Goldstein (Brandeis University, autor de correspondencia)
Año1957
Volumen24
Número2
Páginas156-166
Fecha de publicación1957-04-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaPhilosophy of Science (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0031-8248 • E-ISSN: 1539-767X
EditorialCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1086/287529
OpenAlexW2033499756
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas8

In a contribution to a symposium on “Causality in the Social Sciences,” Lewis Feuer remarks in passing that “Functionalism, in the form which Malinowski gave it, affirms that culture is an ‘organic unity’; it is the principle that in every culture, each custom, belief, and behavioral form ‘represents an indespensible part within a working whole.’” That culture is an integrated and organic unity is a view found quite often in the writings of Malinowski, though he does not maintain it with full consistency. Sometimes he seems to say that a culture is made up of a number of grand institutions, each of which is an integrated unity, though the totality need not be. But whether affirmed or denied this thesis is not the doctrine, characteristic of almost every attempt made by Malinowski to explain cultural phenomena during the last quarter century of his life, which may be properly called “Malinowskian functionalism.” And that the doctrine cited by Feurer is sometimes formulated in such a way that the term “functional” or some variant is used, as in “culture is a functionally integrated organic unity,” makes no difference to my claim. I am not at all certain that the addition of the word “functionally” does anything for the view in question; it surely makes no difference to its scientific sterility. But that apart, the point I wish to make here is that a good many scholars who make references to Malinowski's functionalism have never bothered to discover just what in the world this is. They have been all too ready to cite the vague programmatic pronouncements in which Malinowski's writings abound, while seemingly oblivious to the fact that with rare exception every major attempt by Malinowski to account systematically for some kind of sociocultural phenomena reveals one and the same pattern of explanation. And it is this pattern alone which may be spoken of as Malinowski's method of functional analysis

Doctrine · Epistemology · Functionalism (philosophy of mind) · Sociology · Structural functionalism · Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture · Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice · Philosophy

  • Signs, language and behavior.

    Charles Morris, Charles S Morris•1946

  • The Dynamics of Culture Change; An Inquiry Into Race Relations in Africa

    Bronislaw Malinowski, Louis Stern Memorial Fund et al.•The Dynamics of Culture Change;…•2018

  • The history of ethnological theory

    Robert H Lowie•The history of ethnological theory•2019

  • A Scientific Theory of Culture and Other Essays

    Bronislaw Malinowski•Scientific Theory of Culture and…•2014

  • The Open Society and Its Enemies

    Karl Popper•Open Society and Its Enemies•2012

  • The Nature of Historical Explanation

    L A Grint, Leslie Grint et al.•The Philosophical Quarterly•1954

  • The Group and the Individual in Functional Analysis

    Bronislaw Malinowski•American Journal of Sociology•1939

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae