Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Moving Beyond Unintended Pregnancy

Development of a Person‐Centered Conceptual Framework and Measure of Self‐Assessed Pregnancy Acceptability

Datos Bibliográficos

ID10794810
AutoresSonya Borrero (0000-0001-9355-6654, University of Pittsburgh, autor de correspondencia), Colleen Judge-Golden (0000-0001-9167-9650, Northwestern University), Colleen Judge‐Golden, Christine Dehlendorf (0000-0001-7303-5413, University of California, San Francisco), Lisa S Callegari (0000-0003-1303-806X, VA Puget Sound Health Care System), Megan Hamm (0000-0002-7842-5290, University of Pittsburgh), Megan E Hamm, Flor A Cameron (University of Pittsburgh), Galen E Switzer (0000-0001-8541-9449, University of Pittsburgh), Galen Switzer (University of Pittsburgh), Sarah Wulf (University of California, San Francisco), Elizabeth A Mosley (0000-0001-9534-2457, University of Pittsburgh)
Año2026
Volumen57
Número1
Páginas5-25
Fecha de publicación2026-03-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaStudies in Family Planning (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0039-3665 • E-ISSN: 1728-4465
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/sifp.70044
PMID41601231
OpenAlexW7125935704
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas30

Sexual and reproductive health (SRH) research, programming, policy, and services have long relied on the narrow paradigm of “pregnancy intendedness and planning,” including its “unintended pregnancy” measure. This framework is limited and problematic, overlooking diverse perspectives on pregnancy, structural factors, and non‐parenting outcomes such as abortion and adoption. In response, we developed the Self‐Assessed Pregnancy Acceptability (SAPA) framework and measure as a person‐centered alternative. The SAPA framework was developed by centering the lived experiences of pregnant people in Texas, Tennessee, Pennsylvania, and California through baseline interviews shortly after pregnancy confirmation (N = 31) and follow‐up post‐pregnancy interviews (N = 14). Development was also informed by a diverse Expert Panel (N = 19) including reproductive justice leaders, reproductive measurement experts, and lived experience experts. Using cognitive interviews (N = 13), we refined an 11‐item measure of SAPA that is currently being validated in a nationwide sample of nearly 600 people in early pregnancy. Following validation, SAPA could be integrated into national and state‐level epidemiological surveillance surveys such as the National Survey of Family Growth and the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System. This novel framework and measure offer an alternative to unintended pregnancy and contribute to an ecosystem of person‐centered, rigorously developed measures of SRH equity

Abortion · Conceptual framework · Economic Justice · Fertility · Population · Pregnancy · Reproductive health · The Conceptual Framework · Unintended pregnancy · Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health · Reproductive Health and Contraception · Reproductive Health and Technologies

  • Challenging unintended pregnancy as an indicator of reproductive autonomy

    Open Access•J E Potter, Arthur J Stevenson et al.•Contraception•2019

  • “It just happens”

    Open Access•Sonya Borrero, Cara Nikolajski et al.•Contraception•2015

  • The Measurement and Meaning of Unintended Pregnancy

    Open Access•John Santelli, Roger Rochat et al.•Perspectives on Sexual and…•2003

  • Defining Dimensions of Pregnancy Intendedness

    Open Access•Joseph B Stanford, Rachel Hobbs et al.•Maternal and Child Health Journal•2000

  • I Just Don't Know”

    Open Access•Abigail S Cutler, Abigail Cutler et al.•Women s Health Issues•2017

  • It's Not Planned, But Is It Okay? The Acceptability of Unplanned Pregnancy Among Young People

    Open Access•Anne M Gomez, Stephanie Arteaga et al.•Women s Health Issues•2018

  • The Effects of Unintended Pregnancy on Infant, Child, and Parental Health

    Open Access•Jessica D Gipson, Michael A Koenig et al.•Studies in Family Planning•2008

  • Rethinking the Pregnancy Planning Paradigm

    Open Access•Abigail R A Aiken, Sonya Borrero et al.•Perspectives on Sexual and…•2016

  • Social Norms and Stigma Regarding Unintended Pregnancy and Pregnancy Decisions

    Open Access•Whitney Smith, Janet M Turan et al.•Perspectives on Sexual and…•2016

  • Comparing Prospective and Retrospective Reports of Pregnancy Intention in a Longitudinal Cohort of U.S. Women

    Open Access•Lauren Ralph, Diana Greene Foster et al.•Perspectives on Sexual and…•2020

  • Intimate Relationship Dynamics and Changing Desire for Pregnancy Among Young Women

    Open Access•J S Barber, Warren B Miller et al.•Perspectives on Sexual and…•2019

  • Conceptualisation, development, and evaluation of a measure of unplanned pregnancy

    Gerard T Barrett, Geraldine Barrett et al.•Journal of Epidemiology and…•2004

  • Psychometric Evaluation of an Instrument to Measure Prospective Pregnancy Preferences

    Open Access•Corinne H Rocca, Lauren Ralph et al.•Medical Care•2019

  • Framing Experience

    Open Access•Johannes Wheeldon, Jacqueline Faubert•International Journal of…•2009

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae