A Second Look at T-Unit Analysis

Reconsidering the Sentence

Datos Bibliográficos

ID10816884
AutoresKathleen Bardovi-Harlig (0000-0003-4058-9318, Indiana University, autor de correspondencia)
Año1992
Volumen26
Número2
Páginas390
Fecha de publicación1992-01-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaTESOL Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0039-8322 • E-ISSN: 1545-7249
EditorialJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/3587016
OpenAlexW2035938877
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas47
Referencias citadas2

I Although originally designed to assess syntactic development in written work of children learning their first language, T unit has been widely used in second language research and is particularly useful for oral production (see, for example, Beebe, 1983; Gaies, 1980; Larsen-Freeman, 1983). A variety of measures of complexity have been based on T unit, e.g., words per T unit, words per error-free T unit, and clauses per T unit (Gaies, 1980; Hunt, 1965; Larsen-Freeman, 1983). Nevertheless, for description of syntactic complexity in writing of adult second language learners, sentence-based analyses may be superior. Hunt (1965) introduced T unit, or minimal terminable unit, to measure development of sentences in writing of grade-school children. Each T unit contains one independent clause and its dependent clauses. Hunt (1970) described T units as the shortest units into which a piece of discourse can be cut without leaving any sentence fragments as residue (p. 189). A sentence has two (or more) T units when independent clauses (with subjects and finite verbs) are conjoined as in Example 1, but a single T unit when one or more clauses are embedded in an independent clause as in Example 2

Linguistics · Mathematics education · Sentence · Sociology · Unit (ring theory) · Language Development and Disorders · Philosophy · Psychology · Reading and Literacy Development · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation