Partnership with Parents in Child Protection

A Systems Approach to Evaluate Reformative Developments in Israel

Datos Bibliográficos

ID10894792
AutoresRavit Alfandari (0000-0003-4054-6262, Department of Social Policy, The London School of Economics and Political Science, London, WC2A 2AE, UK, autor de correspondencia)
Año2017
Volumen47
Número4
Páginas1061-1077
Fecha de publicación2017-06-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaThe British Journal of Social Work (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0045-3102 • E-ISSN: 1468-263X
EditorialOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/bjsw/bcw101
OpenAlexW2514636542
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas13
Referencias citadas19

This research was set out to examine the extent to which a national reform in the Israeli child protection decision-making framework of formal committees is achieving its aim for strengthening partnership with parents. The research employed a qualitative method of inquiry and a case-study design. The cases of twenty-one families brought before the committees were investigated and followed up after six months. Data were collected through interviews with social workers and parents and observations of the committees’ discussions. A systems approach was undertaken as a conceptual framework in order to study practice within its organisational context. Based on the relatively small sample, the key finding is a very limited realisation of partnership with parents in terms of allowing them power to influence decisions. This is suggested to have come in the way of improving outcomes for children and families. Evidence showed that mechanisms of coercion and control were used in the discussions in order to enforce agreements. The analysis identified several systemic factors that were obstacles to good partnership working, including: heavy caseloads, lack of time for building relationships, insufficient skills in communicating effectively with parents and paternalistic organisational culture. Implications are discussed in terms of whole-organisational changes.

Child protection · Coercion (linguistics) · Conceptual framework · Context (archaeology) · General partnership · Paternalism · Political science · Power (physics) · Public relations · Realisation · Sociology · Child Abuse and Trauma · Child Welfare and Adoption · Medicine · Nursing · Social Work Education and Practice