Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Evaluating Child Interviews Conducted by Child Protective Services Workers and Police Investigators

Datos Bibliográficos

ID10896239
AutoresGunn Astrid Baugerud (0000-0003-1322-5316, OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University, autor de correspondencia), Ragnhild Klingenberg Røed (0000-0003-2439-9397, OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University), Helle B G Hansen (OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University), Julie Schøning Poulsen (OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University), Miriam S Johnson (0000-0001-7486-2859, OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University)
Año2023
Volumen53
Número5
Páginas2784-2803
Fecha de publicación2023-07-31
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaThe British Journal of Social Work (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0045-3102 • E-ISSN: 1468-263X
EditorialOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/bjsw/bcac245
OpenAlexW4316926901
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas3
Referencias citadas55

High-quality interviews that follow best-practice guidelines are the best means available to frontline child protective service (CPS) workers and specially trained police officers to investigate and detect abuse and maltreatment. In Norway, the CPS and police are trained in the same interview method. In the current quantitative study, we investigate sixty-five interviews conducted by the CPS of children ages 4–8 years and seventy-two interviews conducted by the police of children ages 3–6 years. Our analysis shows that the CPS workers presented more open-ended invitations and fewer suggestive questions than the police officers. However, the CPS also asked more option-posing questions. Still, this finding may indicate that CPS workers come closer than police officers to follow best practice guidelines when they conduct child interviews. It should be noted that the police are also trained in an extended interview method, unlike the CPS workers. The number of open-ended invitations was sparse in both samples. Differences in the span of children’s ages in the two samples and different legal frameworks may have affected the findings. Implications for interview training are discussed

Best practice · Child protection · Medical education · Political science · Child Abuse and Trauma · Intimate Partner and Family Violence · Medicine · Migration, Health and Trauma · Nursing · Psychology

  • Large Language Model (LLM) and Human Performance in Child Investigative Interviewing Question Formulation Tasks

    Open Access•Liisa Järvilehto, Yongjie Sun et al.•Behavioral Sciences & the Law•2026

  • Best practice vs. reality

    Open Access•Hayley Ko, Hayley Manalang Ko et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2026

  • How Do Child Protective Service (CPS) Policies Keep Employees Safe

    Open Access•Karlissa Wise, LaToya Carter et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2024

  • A structured forensic interview protocol improves the quality and informativeness of investigative interviews with children

    Open Access•Michael E Lamb, Yael Orbach et al.•Child Abuse & Neglect•2007

  • Reprint Of

    Open Access•Vincent J Felitti, Robert F Anda et al.•American Journal of Preventive…•2019

  • Assessing the value of structured protocols for forensic interviews of alleged child abuse victims

    Open Access•Yael Orbach, Isaac Hershkowitz et al.•Child Abuse & Neglect•2000

  • Investigative interviewing of alleged child abuse victims

    Ann-Christin Cederborg, Ann‐christin Cederborg et al.•Police Practice and Research•2013

  • Is Ongoing Feedback Necessary to Maintain The Quality of Investigative Interviews With Allegedly Abused Children

    Michael E Lamb, Kathleen J Sternberg et al.•Applied Developmental Science•2002

  • Expected Consequences of Disclosure Revealed in Investigative Interviews with Suspected Victims of Child Sexual Abuse

    Lindsay C Malloy, Sonja P Brubacher et al.•Applied Developmental Science•2011

  • Interviewing Children

    Thomas D Lyons•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2014

  • Communication skills in child protection

    Open Access•Donald Forrester, Sophie Kershaw et al.•Child & Family Social Work•2007

  • A test of three refresher modalities on child forensic interviewers’ posttraining performance

    Mireille Cyr, Jeanne Dion et al.•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2021

  • Adherence to the Revised NICHD Protocol recommendations for conducting repeated supportive interviews is associated with the likelihood that children will allege abuse

    Uri Blasbalg, Isaac Hershkowitz et al.•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2020

  • Improving child investigative interviewer performance through computer-based learning activities

    Martine B Powell, Belinda Guadagno et al.•Policing & Society•2014

  • Prosecutors' recommendations for improving child witness statements about sexual abuse

    Kimberlee Shannon Burrows, Martine B Powell et al.•Policing & Society•2013

  • Children’s Capacities and Role in Matters of Great Significance for Them

    Open Access•Amy McEwan-Strand, Marit Skivenes•The International Journal of…•2020

  • The origin, experimental basis, and application of the standard interview method

    Open Access•Martine B Powell, Sonja P Brubacher•Australian Psychologist•2020

  • Secondary Traumatic Stress, Burnout and Compassion Satisfaction among Norwegian Child Protection Workers

    Gunn Astrid Baugerud, Sille Vangbæk et al.•The British Journal of Social Work•2018

  • Difficulties translating research on forensic interview practices to practitioners

    Open Access•Michael E Lamb•American Psychologist•2016

  • Evaluation of a comprehensive interactive training system for investigative interviewers of children

    Mairi S Benson, Mairi Benson et al.•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2015

Obras citantes distintas3
Citas por año1,5
Intervalo de citas2024 - 2026 (3)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 3
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae