Stanley Kubrick, the 1974 Finance Act, and the crisis of the British film industry
A case study of access, power and privilege in British media and politics
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 11190834 |
|---|---|
| Autores | James Fenwick (0000-0002-1261-7150, Russian State Agrarian Correspondence University, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2024 |
| Volumen | 44 |
| Número | 1 |
| Páginas | 142-167 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2024-01-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Historical Journal Of Film Radio and Television (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0143-9685 • E-ISSN: 1465-3451 |
| Editorial | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/01439685.2023.2256637 |
| OpenAlex | W4386774509 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 4 |
Between 1975 and 1977, filmmaker Stanley Kubrick secretly campaigned to overturn the new tax provisions of the Labour government’s 1974 Finance Act. His aim was to develop a crisis narrative in which the legislation that affected the amount of earnings foreign residents would pay tax on in the UK was deemed directly responsible for the imminent and absolute collapse of the British film industry. Drawing on archival sources from the Stanley Kubrick Archive, the Harold Wilson papers, and The National Archives, the article reconstructs Kubrick’s actions during this period to reveal how he planted stories in the press, lobbied MPs, ministers, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, and the prime minister, manipulated trade union officials, and secretly wrote press releases and campaign letters under the name of the general secretary of the ACTT, Alan Sapper. The archival case study widens understanding of the narrative of crisis pertaining to the British film industry in the 1970s and how this was exacerbated and exploited by powerful and wealthy individuals like Kubrick for personal gain. The article also contributes to the broader topics of access, power, and privilege in British society and how the rich subvert and undermine democracy, thereby aggravating structural inequalities, inequalities that have only deepened since Kubrick’s political interventions and machinations
Art · Economic history · Legislation · Literature · Media studies · Narrative · Political science · Politics · Power (physics) · Privilege (computing) · Sociology · Cinema and Media Studies · History · Law · Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |