What Are the Determinants of Permanent and Temporary Non‐Take‐Up of the French Minimum‐Income Benefit
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 11196641 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Hannafi Cyrine (0000-0001-6108-2984, Laboratoire d'Économie de Poitiers (LEP ‐ UR 13822), Bâtiment A1 Université de Poitiers Poitiers France), Rémi Le Gall (0000-0002-0557-2935, Territoires, Travail, Âge et Santé (TETRAS) Campus Lettres et Sciences Humaines Université de Lorraine Nancy France, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2025 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2025-11-21 |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Social Policy and Administration (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0144-5596 • E-ISSN: 1467-9515 |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/spol.70032 |
| OpenAlex | W4416533261 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 31 |
We investigate the determinants of non‐take‐up of the French minimum‐income benefit, the Active Solidarity Income (Revenu de Solidarité Active [RSA]), using the Tax and Social Income Survey and distinguishing between people in situations of either permanent or temporary eligibility. We use the monthly dimension of the dataset in order to study the dynamics of non‐take‐up. We find that poverty levels in the department of residence and having two or more children decrease the probability of RSA non‐take‐up, in cases where individuals are permanently or temporarily eligible while professional inactivity, receiving rental resources and living as a couple increase the likelihood of submitting a claim in both cases. In the case of permanent eligibility, we find that non‐take‐up of RSA in a given quarter increases the probability of non‐take‐up in the following quarter. Moreover, the amount of the RSA, the level of sanctions, living in a deprived area and the repeated administrative exchanges between claimants and welfare agencies are important factors affecting non‐take‐up in the case of permanent eligibility while take‐up for the Activity Bonus and welfare agencies' credibility in delivering accurate and reliable information, are salient in the temporary eligibility case
Credibility · Order (exchange · Poverty · Quarter (Canadian coin · Renting · Residence · Salient · Solidarity · Welfare · Advanced Causal Inference Techniques · Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics · Social Policy and Reform Studies
Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics
When Do Women Use Aid to Families with Dependent Children and Food Stamps? The Dynamics of Eligibility Versus Participation
Simple solutions to the initial conditions problem in dynamic, nonlinear panel data models with unobserved heterogeneity
A Structural Model of Multiple Welfare Program Participation and Labor Supply
Regional Factors Influencing Non-Take-Up for Social Support in Korea Using a Spatial Regression Model
No claim, no pain. Measuring the non-take-up of social assistance using register data
To take or not to take? An overview of the factors contributing to the non-take-up of public provisions
Impact du non-recours sur l'efficacité du RSA activité seul
Take–up of Means–tested Benefits and Labour Supply
The effectiveness of Luxembourg's minimum guaranteed income
Improving Take-Up by Reaching Out to Potential Beneficiaries. Insights from a Large-Scale Field Experiment in Belgium
| Altamente citado | No |
|---|