Social networks, ethnicity and public home-care utilisation
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 11199596 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Howard Litwin (0000-0003-1323-4562, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2004 |
| Volumen | 24 |
| Número | 6 |
| Páginas | 921-939 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2004-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Ageing and Society (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0144-686X • E-ISSN: 1469-1779 |
| Editorial | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0144686x04002491 |
| OpenAlex | W2114458817 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 17 |
This article examines the relationships between support networks, ethnicity and the utilisation of formal care services, taking into account background characteristics and functional health status among 3,403 older people in Israel. Data were drawn from a national survey in 1997 of people aged 60 or more years. The outcome variable was the use of publicly-financed personal care or homemaking services. About 15 per cent of the study population made use of such home care. Six informal support network constellations were identified by applying cluster analysis to key criterion variables that reflect the inter-personal milieu. The resultant network types were: community-clan, family-focused, diverse, friend-focused, neighbour-focused, and restricted networks. Binary logistic regression revealed that the use of formal home-care services was significantly associated with a respondent's age, gender, functional level and informal support network type (Nagelkerke R 2 =0.39). No association was found between home-care utilisation and a respondent's ethnicity (Arab, Jew, and new Russian immigrant), income or education. The results show that publicly-financed formal care services were utilised more frequently by older-old persons, women, functionally impaired individuals and people embedded in the neighbour-focused and restricted networks (and to a lesser degree, in the diverse and friend-focused networks). Neighbour-focused and restricted network types were characterised by fewer informal support resources at their disposal than the other types. Thus, formal home care was sought more often in cases in which the informal sources of support had less capacity to provide ongoing informal care
Ethnic group · Logistic regression · Political science · Population · Respondent · Social network (sociolinguistics) · Social support · Sociology · Demography · Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes · Health disparities and outcomes · Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving · Medicine · Psychology · Social Psychology · Gerontology
Convoys of Social Relations
Network Type and Mortality Risk in Later Life
Cohort Differences in Received Social Support in Later Life
The impact of intergenerational support on the mental health of older adults
Network-based rehabilitation increases formal support of frail elderly home-dwelling persons in Finland
Users of home-care services in a Nordic welfare state under marketisation
Formal home-care utilisation by older adults in Ireland
Costs and determinants of privately financed home-based health care in Ontario, Canada
Financial worry among older people
Multidimensional Social Support and Health Services Utilization Among Noninstitutionalized Older Persons in Ghana
The Effects of Types of Social Networks, Perceived Social Support, and Loneliness on the Health of Older People
Link Between Social Relationships and Vulnerability Among Community‐Dwelling Older Adults Living Alone in Taiwan
Is use of formal community services by older women related to changes in their informal care arrangements
Profiles of social relations among older adults
A comparison of different definitions of social isolation using Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) data
Support Networking Strategies of Female Chinese Immigrants in London, Ontario
Sociocultural influences on mental health service use by Latino older adults for emotional distress
| Obras citantes distintas | 17 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,85 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2006 - 2025 (20) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 17 |