Deterring Chinese Ballistic Missile Threats to the U.S. Homeland
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 11222641 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Matthew Harris (0000-0002-8201-5817), Matthew L Harris (Hackensack Meridian Health, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2015 |
| Volumen | 34 |
| Número | 5 |
| Páginas | 447-457 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2015-10-20 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Comparative Strategy (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0149-5933 • E-ISSN: 1521-0448 |
| Editorial | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/01495933.2015.1089124 |
| OpenAlex | W2189824700 |
| Idioma | EN |
The Chinese government has made great strides to creating an improved and increasingly capable nuclear arsenal. Despite these developments and deployments, the U.S. government continues to rely on dialogue and strategic stability to deter U.S.-Chinese war. This sole reliance on offensive strategic forces fails to adequately protect the American people from Chinese ballistic missile threats, especially ones armed with nuclear weapons. Preventing a Chinese nuclear weapon from annihilating U.S. cities will do more for deterring nuclear war than emphasizing dialogue and strategic stability while the Chinese government continues to modernize and expand its nuclear arsenal.There are no absolutes in the world of international relations and politics. It is, therefore, prudent to ask whether the United States will be prepared to counter given weapon systems. Defense planners cannot sit on the sidelines and wait for the resolution of a debate over a potential adversary's intentions. – Christopher McConnaughy1
Adversary · Ballistic missile · China · Computer security · Deterrence theory · Government (linguistics · Homeland security · Missile · Missile Defense · National security · Nuclear warfare · Nuclear weapon · Offensive · Operations research · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Strategic Defense Initiative · Terrorism · Computer Science · Engineering · European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Nuclear Issues and Defense
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |