Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Missing, Biased, and Unrepresentative

The Quantitative Analysis of Multisource Biographical Data

Datos Bibliográficos

ID11253643
AutoresGidon Cohen (0000-0002-9899-5389, University of Salford, autor de correspondencia)
Año2002
Volumen35
Número4
Páginas166-176
Fecha de publicación2002-01-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaHistorical Methods A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0161-5440 • E-ISSN: 1940-1906
EditorialInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/01615440209601206
OpenAlexW2015315121
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas6
Referencias citadas25

With the growth in interest in collective biography as a historical technique, many predominantly qualitative historians find themselves faced with large amounts of information. These data, collected from a variety of sources, are often highly irregular, making statistical analysis extremely problematic. Current practice is to ignore these problems and proceed with quantitative analysis suitable only for much more regular data. It is argued that a more satisfactory approach is to ascertain and directly confront the difficulties of analyzing such information. The three central problems are identified as missing data, systematic bias, and the lack of a representative sample. Using a practical example, the author explores the relationship between gender, the family, and political socialization within the Communist Party of Great Britain and shows how each of the issues can be dealt with in turn. The author first distinguishes truly missing data from “negative information,” which commonly appears to be missing in historical sources. He then stratifies the data to remove systematic biases relating to the issue at hand. Finally, he divides the sample into different populations, on the basis of the sources from which individuals are known, and compares the results obtained to examine whether his conclusions appear to depend on quirks of populations contained in the sources. These ideas open a new range of sources to quantitative analysis and raise the possibility of allowing new types of evidence to count in historical inquiry

Data science · Epistemology · Missing data · Political science · Politics · Quantitative analysis (chemistry · Sample (material · Social science · Socialization · Sociology · Statistics · Variety (cybernetics · Computer Science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Mathematics

  • Annual Bibliography of Works about Life Writing, 2002-2003

    Phyllis E Wachter, William Todd Schultz•Biography•2003

  • Career Paths in Institutional Business Elites

    Open Access•Juha Kansikas•Enterprise & Society•2015

  • The business elite in Finland

    Juha Kansikas•Business History•2015

  • Propensity-Score Methods and the Lenin School

    Gidon Cohen•The Journal of Interdisciplinary…•2005

  • Capture-Recapture Methods and Party Activism in Britain

    Gidon Cohen, Lewis Mates et al.•The Journal of Interdisciplinary…•2012

  • Turning qualitative into quantitative evidence

    Open Access•A W Carus, Sheilagh Ogilvie•The Economic History Review•2009

  • Strikes and Solidarity

    Open Access•Roy Church, Quentin Outram•Strikes and Solidarity•1998

  • Statistical Analysis With Missing Data

    Maureen Lahiff, Roderick J A Little et al.•Journal of the American…•1989

  • The Effectiveness of Adjustment by Subclassification in Removing Bias in Observational Studies

    W G Cochran•Biometrics•1968

  • Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using Subclassification on the Propensity Score

    Paul R Rosenbaum, Donald B Rubin•Journal of the American…•1984

  • Inference and missing data

    Donald B Rubin•Biometrika•1976

  • Equivocal Feminists

    Open Access•Karen Hunt•Equivocal Feminists•1996

  • Do Historians Count Anymore

    John F Reynolds•Historical Methods A Journal of…•1998

  • Log-linear analysis of contingency tables

    J Morgan Kousser, Gary W Cox et al.•Historical Methods A Journal of…•1982

  • Which Road to the past? Two Views of History

    J H M Salmon, Robert William Fogel et al.•Social Science History•1985

  • Interpreting the Self

    Laurel Richardson, Diane Bjorklund•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1999

  • An Introduction to Quantitative Methods for Historians

    Charles M Dollar, Roderick Floud•The Journal of Southern History•1974

  • The New History and the Old

    Thomas Bender, Gertrude Himmelfarb•Journal of American History•1988

  • Nuptiality and Age At Marriage in Nineteenth-Century England

    Open Access•R I Woods, Andrew Hinde et al.•Journal of Family History•1985

  • Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data

    Open Access•Gary King, James Honaker et al.•American Political Science Review•2001

  • Labour Women

    Pamela M Graves, Pamela Graves et al.•History Reviews of New Books•1995

  • Databases in Historical Research

    Ian Winchester, Charles Harvey et al.•The Journal of Interdisciplinary…•1997

  • Statistical Analysis with Missing Data

    Open Access•Bo Ning, N Bo et al.•Population•1988

Obras citantes distintas6
Citas por año0,26
Intervalo de citas2003 - 2015 (13)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 5
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae