On corrective questions and the position of focus
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 11293077 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Vieri Samek-Lodovici (0000-0002-9827-1014, University College London, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2025 |
| Volumen | 43 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 1899-1947 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2025-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Natural Language and Linguistic Theory (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0167-806X • E-ISSN: 1573-0859 |
| Editorial | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11049-025-09656-6 |
| OpenAlex | W4410548305 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 48 |
Corrective questions exploit focalization to correct and replace a preceding question much like corrective statements exploit focalization to correct and replace a preceding statement. This paper examines Italian corrective questions in depth, presenting new experimental data supporting their grammatical status. It also shows that Italian corrective questions constitute root interrogative clauses, lack a terminal rise, and qualify as canonical questions when assessed with respect to Farkas’ criteria (Farkas 2022). Corrective questions are theoretically significant because they simultaneously contain a wh-phrase and a corrective focus in a root clause. Their grammaticality challenges the widely held hypothesis that wh-phrases and corrective foci must both be interpreted in a left-peripheral FocP projection that can only hosts one or the other. This hypothesis incorrectly predicts corrective questions to be impossible. I will argue, instead, that corrective foci can be interpreted in-situ, and that focalization à la Rooth (1992) and contrast à la Neeleman and Vermeulen (2012) naturally extend to corrective questions and straightforwardly account for their interpretation and corrective import. The paper also examines focus fronting, discussing the object / non-object divide that emerges from the experimental data and showing that non-object corrective foci may front even when a wh-phrase is present
Corrective Feedback · Exploit · Focalization · Grammar · Grammaticality · Interrogative · Linguistics · Natural language processing · Phrase · Underspecification · Computer Science · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Philosophy · Psychology · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation · Artificial Intelligence
On Information Structure, Meaning and Form
The Blackwell Companion to Syntax
Experimental Designs in Sentence Processing Research
Dutch scrambling and the nature of discourse templates
Locality and Left Periphery
Gorilla in our midst
The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery
On the Form and Interpretation of Echo Wh-Questions
Non-Intrusive Questions as a Special Type of Non-Canonical Questions
Focus and contrastive topic in questions and answers, with particular reference to Turkish
Information-structural restrictions on Ā-scrambling
Contrastive topics decomposed
Focus in wh-questions
The distribution of focus and the mapping between syntax and information structure
(No) variation in the grammar of alternatives
Scope Freezing Restricts Binding in Italian Right-Dislocation
The Interaction of Focus, Givenness, and Prosody
Basic notions of information structure
Make Short Answers Shorter
Observations on embedding verbs, evidentiality, and presupposition
Intervention Effects Follow from Focus Interpretation
A theory of focus interpretation
Categorical versus gradient grammar in phonotactics
Ā-Movement and conventional implicatures
Focus and the exclusion of alternatives
Magnitude Estimation of Linguistic Acceptability
The intonation of polar questions in Italian
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |