Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Abortion Attitudes, Gender, and Candidate Choice in Presidential Elections

1972 To 1992

Datos Bibliográficos

ID11367667
AutoresMark J Wattier (a Murray State University , USA, autor de correspondencia), Byron W Daynes (b Brigham Young University , USA), Raymond Tatalovich (0000-0002-2670-0959, c Loyola University , Chicago, USA)
Año1996
Volumen17
Número1
Páginas55-72
Fecha de publicación1996-10-25
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaWomen & Politics (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0195-7732 • E-ISSN: 1540-9473
EditorialInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1300/j014v17n01_03
OpenAlexW1561065617
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas3
Referencias citadas20

This work analyzes voting for president to determine the impact of abortion attitudes on candidate choice in the six elections from 1972 through 1992. First, the literature is surveyed, then the relationships between party and abortion attitudes and between abortion attitudes and candidate choice are revealed. Most important is a probit analysis that includes party preference, net candidate image, incumbent popularity, gender, and abortion attitudes. The data base is the National Election Study for each year. Findings are consistent throughout the period: incumbent popularity, party preference, and net candidate image are statistically significant predictors in all elections; gender is never significant but attitudes on abortion are for 1972 and 1992. Is abortion finally becoming a realigning issue, not for political party but for women as an electoral bloc? To explore whether 1992 portends future changes in abortion politics, we focus on 1992 and isolate the “mobilized” voters (who did not vote in 1988 but voted in 1992), and “converted” voters (who voted one way in 1988 and another in 1992). The data show that women predominated in both subsets and, irrespective of gender, both groups held pro-choice views. A final probit analysis adding two dummy variables shows conversion, not mobilization, to be the stronger influence

Abortion · Biology · Political science · Politics · Pregnancy · Presidential system · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Psychology · Reproductive Health and Contraception · Social Psychology

  • Disseminating Evidence on Abortion Facilities to Health Departments

    Katie Woodruff, Nancy F Berglas et al.•Health Communication•2023

  • Abortion policy preferences are structured, stable, and consequential

    Open Access•Nicté Hernández, Natalie Hernandez et al.•American Journal of Political…•2026

  • Another Issue Comes Out

    Laurie A Rhodebeck•Journal of Homosexuality•2014

  • The Responsible Electorate

    V O Key, Arthur Maass et al.•Responsible Electorate•1966

  • An economic theory of democracy

    Anthony Downs•An economic theory of democracy•1985

  • The Changing American Voter

    Norman H Nie, Sidney Verba et al.•Changing American Voter•1979

  • The Lowi Paradigm, Moral Conflict, and Coalition-Building

    Raymond Tatalovich, Byron W Daynes•Women & Politics•1993

  • The Lowi paradigm, moral conflict, and coalition-building

    Raymond Tatalovich, Byron Daynes•Women & Politics•1993

  • It's Abortion, Stupid

    Alan I Abramowitz•The Journal of Politics•1995

  • Probing the Bounds of Conventional Wisdom

    John Aldrich, John H Aldrich et al.•American Journal of Political…•1975

  • Abortion

    Greg D Adams•American Journal of Political…•1997

  • Issue Salience and Party Choice

    Open Access•David E Repa, David E RePass•American Political Science Review•1929

  • From Confusion to Clarity

    Open Access•Gerald M Pomper•American Political Science Review•1972

  • The Simple Act of Voting

    Open Access•Stanley Kelley, Thad W Mirer•American Political Science Review•1974

  • A Majority Party in Disarray

    Open Access•Arthur H Miller, Warren E Miller et al.•American Political Science Review•1976

  • Popular Control of Public Policy

    Open Access•Richard W Boyd, Richard Boyd•American Political Science Review•1972

Obras citantes distintas3
Citas por año0,25
Intervalo de citas2014 - 2026 (13)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 3
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae