Reassessing the Feminist Theoretical Project in Law

Datos Bibliográficos

ID11448552
AutoresJoanne Conaghan (0000-0002-6810-9462, University of Bristol, autor de correspondencia)
Año2000
Volumen27
Número3
Páginas351-385
Fecha de publicación2000-09-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaJournal of Law and Society (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0263-323X • E-ISSN: 1467-6478
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/1467-6478.00159
OpenAlexW2025271817
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas40

This article seeks to address the current state of theoretical debate within feminist legal studies in the United Kingdom and beyond. It is part map, part critique of dominant theoretical trends – an attempt to identify and explore a range of questions about feminist scholarly engagement in law, including the relationship between academic feminism and political activism, the distinction (if any) between ‘feminist’ analyses and broader engagements with law and gender, and the normative underpinnings of feminist legal scholarship. The author makes no pretence to neutrality on these issues, questioning the perceived ‘drift’ between political and academic feminism, and arguing strongly for the recognition and realization of feminism's normative and transformative aspirations. Similarly, she challenges the emergence of an ‘anti‐essentialist’ norm in feminist discourse, and reaffirms the value of ‘women‐centred’ feminist approaches. Finally, this article is also a personal venture, a ‘stock‐taking’ exercise which seeks to interrogate the author's own understanding of what feminist legal work entails

Essentialism · Feminism · Feminist Legal Theory · Feminist philosophy · Neutrality · Norm (philosophy · Normative · Political science · Politics · Scholarship · Sociology · Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies · Gender Studies · Law · Law in Society and Culture · Legal Education and Practice Innovations