Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Factors that influence the scale up of new interventions in low-income settings

A qualitative case study of the introduction of chlorhexidine cleansing of the umbilical cord in Bangladesh

Datos Bibliográficos

ID11490751
AutoresJennifer A Callaghan-Koru (0000-0002-3007-1702, Department of Sociology, Anthropology, and Health Administration and Policy, University of Maryland, 1000 Hilltop Circle, Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD 21250, USA, autor de correspondencia), Munia Islam (0000-0002-7036-5318, MaMoni Health Systems Strengthening Project, Save the Children International, House CWN (A) 35, Road 43, Gulshan 2, Dhaka- 1212, Bangladesh), Marufa Aziz Khan (0009-0002-0643-2771, Save the Children), Marufa Khan (MaMoni Health Systems Strengthening Project, Save the Children International, House CWN (A) 35, Road 43, Gulshan 2, Dhaka- 1212, Bangladesh), Ardy Sowe (Department of Sociology, Anthropology, and Health Administration and Policy, University of Maryland, 1000 Hilltop Circle, Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD 21250, USA), Jahrul Islam (Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Dhaka, Bangladesh), Imteaz Ibne Mannan (MaMoni Health Systems Strengthening Project, Save the Children International, House CWN (A) 35, Road 43, Gulshan 2, Dhaka- 1212, Bangladesh), Joby George (0000-0002-4791-901X, MaMoni Health Systems Strengthening Project, Save the Children International, House CWN (A) 35, Road 43, Gulshan 2, Dhaka- 1212, Bangladesh)
Año2020
Volumen35
Número4
Páginas440-451
Fecha de publicación2020-05-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaHealth Policy and Planning (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0268-1080 • E-ISSN: 1460-2237
EditorialOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/heapol/czz156
PMID32068867
OpenAlexW3007384164
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas1
Referencias citadas46

There is a well-recognized need for empirical study of processes and factors that influence scale up of evidence-based interventions in low-income countries to address the ‘know-do’ gap. We undertook a qualitative case study of the scale up of chlorhexidine cleansing of the umbilical cord (CHX) in Bangladesh to identify and compare facilitators and barriers for the institutionalization and expansion stages of scale up. Data collection and analysis for this case study were informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and the WHO/ExpandNet model of scale up. At the national level, we interviewed 20 stakeholders involved in CHX policy or implementation. At the district level, we conducted interviews with 31 facility-based healthcare providers in five districts and focus group discussions (FGDs) with eight community-based providers and eight programme managers. At the community level, we conducted 7 FGDs with 53 mothers who had a baby within the past year. Expanded interview notes were thematically coded and analysed following an adapted Framework approach. National stakeholders identified external policy and incentives, and the engagement of stakeholders in policy development through the National Technical Working Committee for Newborn Health, as key facilitators for policy and health systems changes. Stakeholders, providers and families perceived the intervention to be simple, safe and effective, and more consistent with family preferences than the prior policy of dry cord care. The major barriers that delayed or decreased the public health impact of the scale up of CHX in Bangladesh’s public health system related to commodity production, procurement and distribution. Bangladesh’s experience scaling up CHX suggests that scale up should involve early needs assessments and planning for institutionalizing new drugs and commodities into the supply chain. While the five CFIR domains were useful for categorizing barriers and facilitators, additional constructs are needed for common health systems barriers in low-income settings

Business · Economic growth · Economics · Environmental health · Focus group · Health care · Implementation research · Incentive · Institutionalisation · Psychological intervention · Public health · Qualitative research · Scale (ratio) · Sociology · Child Nutrition and Water Access · Global Maternal and Child Health · Health Policy Implementation Science · Marketing · Medicine · Nursing

  • Conceptualizing outcomes for use with the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)

    Open Access•Laura J Damschroder, Caitlin M Reardon et al.•Implementation Science•2022

  • Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality in 2000–13, with projections to inform post-2015 priorities

    Open Access•Li Liu, Shefali Oza et al.•The Lancet•2015

  • A systematic review of the use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research

    Open Access•M Alexis Kirk, Caitlin Kelley et al.•Implementation Science•2015

  • Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks

    Open Access•Phoebe Nilsen, Per Nilsen•Implementation Science•2015

  • Medicine prices, availability, and affordability in 36 developing and middle-income countries

    Open Access•A Cameron, Margaret Ewen et al.•The Lancet•2009

  • Is verbatim transcription of interview data always necessary?

    Open Access•Elizabeth Halcomb, Elizabeth J Halcomb et al.•Applied Nursing Research•2006

  • Can available interventions end preventable deaths in mothers, newborn babies, and stillbirths, and at what cost?

    Open Access•Zulfiqar A Bhutta, Jai K Das et al.•The Lancet•2014

  • Countdown to 2030

    Open Access•Ties Boerma, Jennifer Requejo et al.•The Lancet•2018

  • Global health 2035

    Open Access•D T Jamison, Lawrence H Summers et al.•The Lancet•2013

  • Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980–2015

    Open Access•Haidong Wang, Mohsen Naghavi et al.•The Lancet•2016

  • “Scaling-out” evidence-based interventions to new populations or new health care delivery systems

    Open Access•Gregory A Aarons, Marisa Sklar et al.•Implementation Science•2017

  • Systematic debriefing after qualitative encounters

    Open Access•Shannon A Mcmahon, Peter J Winch•BMJ Global Health•2018

  • Narrative review of models and success factors for scaling up public health interventions

    Open Access•Andrew J Milat, Adrian Bauman et al.•Implementation Science•2015

  • Dynamic adaptation process to implement an evidence-based child maltreatment intervention

    Open Access•Gregory A Aarons, Amy E Green et al.•Implementation Science•2012

  • Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice

    Open Access•Laura J Damschroder, David C Aron et al.•Implementation Science•2009

  • Scaling up antiretroviral therapy in Uganda

    Open Access•Ricarda Windisch, Peter Waiswa et al.•Globalization and Health•2011

  • Institutionalizing community-focused maternal, newborn, and child health strategies to strengthen health systems

    Open Access•William T Story, Karen LeBan et al.•Globalization and Health•2017

  • The Adaptome

    Open Access•David A Chambers, Wynne E Norton•American Journal of Preventive…•2016

  • Scaling up in international health

    Open Access•Lindsay Mangham-Jefferies, L J Mangham et al.•Health Policy and Planning•2010

  • Critical interactions between Global Fund-supported programmes and health systems

    Open Access•James W Rudge, S Phuanakoonon et al.•Health Policy and Planning•2010

  • Understanding pathways for scaling up health services through the lens of complex adaptive systems

    Open Access•Ligia Paina, David H Peters•Health Policy and Planning•2012

  • Benchmarks to measure readiness to integrate and scale up newborn survival interventions

    Open Access•Amelia Castillo Morán, Allisyn C Moran et al.•Health Policy and Planning•2012

  • How complexity science can inform scale-up and spread in health care

    Open Access•Holly Jordan Lanham, Luci K Leykum et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2012

  • Applying ExpandNet's Systematic Approach to Scaling Up in an Integrated Population, Health and Environment Project in East Africa

    Open Access•Antony Omimo, Dorah Taranta et al.•Social Sciences•2018

  • Utilization of HIV-related services from the private health sector

    Open Access•Wenjuan Wang, Sara Sulzbach et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2011

  • Rapid ethnographic assessment

    Open Access•Margaret E Bentley, Gretel H Pelto et al.•Social Science & Medicine•1988

  • Scaling-up a public health innovation

    Open Access•Deborah L Billings, Barbara B Crane et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2007

Obras citantes distintas1
Citas por año0,25
Intervalo de citas2022 - 2022 (1)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 1
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae