Imagine There Is a War and No One Turns Up! A Response to the Commentaries
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 11638220 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Stephen Reicher (0000-0002-3449-0082, University of St Andrews), Willem Doise (University of Geneva), Guy Elcheroth (0000-0002-5226-0555, University of Lausanne) |
| Año | 2011 |
| Volumen | 32 |
| Número | 5 |
| Páginas | 781-783 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2011-06-20 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Political Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0162-895X • E-ISSN: 1467-9221 |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00837.x |
| OpenAlex | W1567760554 |
| Idioma | EN |
In this response to the commentaries, we make one concession and try to clarify two critical points raised by the commentators. The concession is about the common stock of knowledge on which social representations approaches draw in general, and the model outlined in our article in particular. The two points we attempt to clarify concern the importance of both an intergroup perspective and of the structural components of power to our model of social representations
Economics · Epistemology · Perspective (graphical · Positive economics · Power (physics · Sociology · Stock (firearms · Community Health and Development · Computer Science · Cultural Differences and Values · History · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology · Social Representations and Identity
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |