Did the Pentagon get the quadrennial defense review right
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 11638576 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Michele A Flournoy (Center for Strategic and International Studies, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2006 |
| Volumen | 29 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 67-84 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2006-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | The Washington Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0163-660X • E-ISSN: 1530-9177 |
| Editorial | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1162/wash.2006.29.2.67 |
| OpenAlex | W2063379164 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 2 |
| Referencias citadas | 3 |
The most recent review produced some welcome refinements in U.S. defense strategy but fell far short of its objectives, devolving into budget-driven horse trading and raising questions about whether incumbent administrations should be required to conduct these exercises
Computer security · Economics · Fell · Geography · Law and economics · Operations research · Pentagon · Political science · Raising (metalworking · Computer Science · Defense, Military, and Policy Studies · Engineering · Law · Military and Defense Studies · Military History and Strategy
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,1 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2006 - 2018 (13) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 2 |