Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

SLA as complex, dynamical and predictable

A Processability Theory perspective

Datos Bibliográficos

ID11655664
AutoresBronwen Patricia Dyson (0000-0002-7519-0369, The University of Sydney, autor de correspondencia)
Año2022
Volumen39
Número4
Páginas1279-1292
Fecha de publicación2022-11-04
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaSecond language Research (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0267-6583 • E-ISSN: 1477-0326
EditorialSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/02676583221132726
OpenAlexW4308198131
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas2
Referencias citadas36

This article enters the debate about the complex and dynamical nature of second language acquisition (SLA) by discussing and commenting on Pallotti’s critique of Complex Dynamic Systems Theory (CDST). Pallotti’s critique brings to the fore the argument that, due to its anti-reductionist stance, CDST research fails to observe three fundamental research criteria, namely that research should (1) construct models, (2) make generalizations and falsifiable predictions and (3) adopt clear empirical approaches. While Pallotti does not explore research already moving SLA beyond anti-reductionist approaches to complexity and dynamism, the debate can be advanced by examining research doing exactly this. This article aims to evaluate the extent to which Processability Theory (PT) – a theory of second language (L2) processing that advocates reductionism for the sake of theory construction – meets Pallotti’s criteria for researching L2 complexity and dynamics. By discussing Pallotti’s – and PT’s – criticisms of CDST, the article outlines the implied research criteria and delineates how PT meets these criteria by (1) its bidimensional design, (2) its generalizations and falsifiable predictions for development and variation, and (3) its operationalization of constructs. Findings from a longitudinal study of L2 English are presented. These findings elucidate that, by meeting the criteria, PT can reveal the predictable, implicational development of processing complexity in eight learners and the patterned, dynamical interaction between development and variation in the trajectories of two of these learners. The article concludes that PT fulfils Pallotti’s (2022) criteria and, by a reductionist approach which models SLA as multidimensional, it can generate what CDST cannot; dynamical and complex L2 systems which progress in predictable stages, with well-defined constraints on variation, including DST-defined constraints. The article closes by discussing the implications of PT’s approach for future research on L2 complexity and dynamics

Argument (complex analysis · Cognitive science · Dynamical systems theory · Epistemology · Falsifiability · Linguistics · Operationalization · Perspective (graphical · Reductionism · Second-language acquisition · Sociology · Computer Science · EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning · Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism · Philosophy · Psychology · Second Language Acquisition and Learning · Artificial Intelligence

  • Dangerous dichotomies and misunderstandings in L2 research

    Open Access•John Truscott, Mike Sharwood Smith et al.•Second language Research•2024

  • Can dynamical systems theory be applied to second language acquisition? The issues of reductionism and intentionality

    Open Access•Manfred Pienemann, Anke Lenzing et al.•Second language Research•2024

  • Cross-Linguistic Aspects of Processability Theory

    Manfred Pienemann•Cross-linguistic aspects of…•2005

  • Language Processing and Second Language Development

    Manfred Pienemann•Language processing and second…•1998

  • Speaking

    Willem J M Levelt•Speaking•1989

  • Variability in Second Language Development From a Dynamic Systems Perspective

    Open Access•Marjolijn Verspoor, Wander Lowie et al.•Modern Language Journal•2008

  • A dynamic usage based perspective on L2 writing

    Open Access•Marjolijn Verspoor, Monika S Schmid et al.•Journal of Second Language Writing•2012

  • Complexity Theory

    Diane Larsen‐freeman, DIANE LARSEN-FREEMAN•Complexity Theory and Language…•2017

  • On determining developmental stages in natural second language acquisition

    Open Access•Jurgen M Meisel, Harald Clahsen et al.•Studies in Second Language…•1981

  • Item versus system learning

    R Ellis•Applied Linguistics•1999

  • Stages or Continua in Second Language Acquisition

    Michael Sharwood Smith, John Truscott•Applied Linguistics•2005

  • Variation, individual differences and second language processing

    Bronwen Patricia Dyson•Linguistic Approaches to…•2016

  • Complexity A Guided Tour

    Melanie Mitchell•Complexity: A Guided Tour•2009

  • Applicability of processability theory to Japanese adolescent EFL learners

    Open Access•Akiko Eguchi, Masatoshi Sugiura•System•2015

  • An analysis of Japanese university students’ oral performance in English using processability theory

    Open Access•HIDEKI SAKAI•System•2008

  • Processability Theory and the role of morphology in English as a second language development

    Open Access•Bronwen Patricia Dyson•Second language Research•2009

  • From number agreement to the subjunctive

    Open Access•Carrie L Bonilla•Second language Research•2014

  • Developmental stages in receptive grammar acquisition

    Open Access•Aafke Buyl, Alex Housen•Second language Research•2015

  • Reassessing the applicability of Processability Theory

    Open Access•Helen Charters, Loan Dao et al.•Second language Research•2011

  • Cratylus’ silence

    Open Access•Gabriele Pallotti•Second language Research•2021

  • The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations

    Mark Baltin, Joan Bresnan•Language•1985

  • Variability and Variation in Second Language Acquisition Orders

    Open Access•Wander Lowie, Marjolijn Verspoor•Language Learning•2015

  • Is acculturation unidimensional or bidimensional? A head-to-head comparison in the prediction of personality, self-identity, and adjustment

    Andrew G Ryder, Lynn E Alden et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2000

  • A Dynamic Systems Theory approach to second language acquisition

    Open Access•Kees De Bot, Wander Lowie et al.•Bilingualism Language and Cognition•2007

  • A Basis for Scaling Qualitative Data

    Louis Guttman•American Sociological Review•1944

  • Individual Differences and the Ergodicity Problem

    Open Access•Wander Lowie, Wander M Lowie et al.•Language Learning•2019

  • An Outline of Processability Theory and Its Relationship to Other Approaches to SLA

    Open Access•Manfred Pienemann•Language Learning•2015

  • Exploring Regularities and Dynamic Systems in L2 Development

    Open Access•Anke Lenzing•Language Learning•2015

Obras citantes distintas2
Citas por año1
Intervalo de citas2024 - 2024 (1)
Velocidad de citaciónrecent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 2
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae