Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Role Inversion and Its Function in the Iphigeneia at Aulis

Datos Bibliográficos

ID11765366
AutoresDale Chant (Monash University, autor de correspondencia)
Año1986
Volumen15
Número2
Páginas83-92
Fecha de publicación1986-01-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaRamus (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0048-671X • E-ISSN: 2202-932X
EditorialCambridge University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1017/s0048671x00003350
OpenAlexW2892126443
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas1
Referencias citadas6

In the Iphigeneia at Aulis role and role inversion are paramount concerns. Indeed it could be contended that in this play we find Euripides' clearest and best defined account of human (and divine) variability. Agamemnon, Menelaos, Achilleus, Iphigeneia, and even, in the final analysis, Artemis, all take positions and attitudes diametrically opposed to those initially adopted. Moreover, the basic thrust behind these movements in position and attitude is the same for each of these characters. All are concerned, in one way or another, with the saving or destruction of Iphigeneia, a situation which most emphatically includes Iphigeneia herself. For on the one hand she wildly supplicates to be saved, while on the other she gladly offers her body to the blade. In addition, Iphigeneia plays a crucial role in greater destructions. If she is destroyed by Agamemnon's and the army's actions, then Greece is destroyed in turn by her (Agamemnon's and the Greeks' final triumph is a ‘Pyrrhic’ victory at best), a situation made all the more ironic by her affected stance of saviour to the fatherland. In Iphigeneia's case, however, the discrepancy between intention and the consequences of action is innocent enough. The play gives no hint that she is at all aware of the irony implicit in her actions. But such lack of awareness is not postulated with regard to Agamemnon, Menelaos and Achilleus. The duplicities and hypocrisies of these three have been the subject of much analysis, and it is at least a critical commonplace to observe that they are characterised in a way more reminiscent of the sour end of everyday life than of the due proprieties associated with heroic, or Homeric, behaviour

Action (physics · Ancient history · Epistemology · Glory · Greeks · Inversion (geology · Irony · Linguistics · Physics · Political science · Subject (documents · Victory · Classical Antiquity Studies · Computer Science · History · Law · Philosophy

  • Bibliographie

    Open Access•Ruth E Harder•Die Frauenrollen bei Euripides•1993

  • Euripides

    P Michelakis, Christopher Collard et al.•Euripides•2017

  • A Companion to Greek Tragedy

    Marsh Mccall, John Ferguson•The Classical World•1974

  • Euripidean Drama

    Wesley D Smith, D J Conacher•Phoenix•1969

Obras citantes distintas1
Citas por año0,03
Intervalo de citas1993 - 1993 (1)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 1
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae