Late Pleistocene Human Occupation In Tasmania

A Reply To Thomas

Datos Bibliográficos

ID11798331
AutoresRichard Cosgrove (0000-0002-9625-3576, La Trobe University, autor de correspondencia), Jyai Allen (0000-0003-3196-0883, La Trobe University), Brendan Marshall (0009-0002-9109-1309, La Trobe University)
Año1994
Volumen38
Número1
Páginas28-35
Fecha de publicación1994-01-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaAustralian Archaeology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0312-2417 • E-ISSN: 2470-0363
EditorialTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/03122417.1994.11681516
OpenAlexW1577392009
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas8
Referencias citadas9

In a recent paper, Thomas (1993) makes a number of assertions about the human use of the Tasmanian southwest during the late Pleistocene period and comments particularly on a model of human behaviour and ecological interaction by Cosgrove et al. (1990). In using our paper as a stalking-horse, Thomas rnisrepresents us specifically and generally on a number of occasions. He also uses a range of data and sources of various degrees of relevance and accuracy in uncritical and frequently misleading ways. In responding to this paper, which we believe was written to contribute less to an academic debate than to a political one, we are restricted by space to addressing only some of the points with which we are prepared to take issue

Archaeology · Criminology · Environmental ethics · Geography · Pleistocene · Political science · Politics · Project commissioning · Publishing · Range (aeronautics · Relevance (law · Social science · Sociology · Stalking · Engineering · History · Law · Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies · Philosophy · Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology · Wildlife Ecology and Conservation