Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Consumer voting and demand behavior regarding swine gestation crates

Datos Bibliográficos

ID11929845
AutoresGlynn T Tonsor (0000-0003-3824-6084, Michigan State University, autor de correspondencia), Christopher Wolf (0000-0002-5519-3845), Christopher A Wolf (0000-0003-4181-285X, Michigan State University), Nicole J Olynk (Michigan State University), Nicole Olynk
Año2009
Volumen34
Número6
Páginas492-498
Fecha de publicación2009-07-15
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaFood Policy (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0306-9192 • E-ISSN: 1873-5657
EditorialElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.foodpol.2009.06.008
OpenAlexW2061801230
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas9
Referencias citadas25

Biology · Business · Consumer demand · Economics · Gestation · Market economy · Political science · Politics · Pregnancy · Public economics · Quality (philosophy · Voting · Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Environmental Sustainability in Business · Law · Marketing

  • Designing Discrete Choice Experiments

    Jordan J Louviere, Towhidul Islam et al.•Journal of Consumer Research•2008

  • Who are farm animal welfare conscious consumers

    Open Access•Albert Boaitey, Kota Minegishi•British Food Journal•2020

  • U.S. public sentiment toward policy action targeting emissions from beef production

    Open Access•Jaime R Luke, Glynn T Tonsor•Food Policy•2025

  • Where is the value? The impacts of sow gestation crate laws on pork supply and consumer value perceptions

    Open Access•Benjamin Blemings, Peilu Zhang et al.•Food Policy•2023

  • Willingness to pay for other species' well-being

    Open Access•Brian Vander Naald, Trudy Ann Cameron•Ecological Economics•2011

  • An Overview of Engineering Approaches to Improving Agricultural Animal Welfare

    Open Access•Candace Croney, William Muir et al.•Journal of Agricultural and…•2018

  • Limitations on the Confinement of Food Animals in the United States

    Open Access•Terence J Centner•Journal of Agricultural and…•2009

  • Demand for farm animal welfare and producer implications

    Open Access•David L Ortega, Christopher A Wolf•Food Policy•2017

  • Consumers and animal welfare. A comparison between European Union countries

    Open Access•Luiza Toma, Alistair W Stott et al.•Appetite•2012

  • Multivariate data analysis

    William W Cooley•Multivariate data analysis•1971

  • Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses

    Open Access•W Michael Hanemann•American Journal of Agricultural…•1984

  • Understanding Heterogeneous Preferences in Random Utility Models

    Open Access•Peter C Boxall, Wiktor Adamowicz et al.•Environmental and Resource…•2002

  • Statistical Efficiency of Double‐Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation

    Open Access•Michael Hanemann, W Michael Hanemann et al.•American Journal of Agricultural…•1991

  • One-and-One-Half-Bound Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation

    Joseph Cooper, Joseph C Cooper et al.•The Review of Economics and…•2002

  • High animal welfare standards in the EU and international trade – How to prevent potential ‘low animal welfare havens’

    Open Access•Harald Grethe•Food Policy•2006

  • Effects of Air Quality Regulations on Polluting Industries

    Randy A Becker, Randy Becker et al.•Journal of Political Economy•2000

  • Designing Discrete Choice Experiments

    Jordan J Louviere, Towhidul Islam et al.•Journal of Consumer Research•2008

Citas por año0,5
Intervalo de citas2008 - 2025 (18)
Altamente citadoNo
Abrir DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae