Crafting Utopia
Notes on the tensions within Marxist-related conceptualizations
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 11951180 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Mônica Soares (0000-0002-5212-0608, Universidade Católica Portuguesa), Mónica Catarina Soares (Universidade Católica Portuguesa, autor de correspondencia), Sergio Martín Tapia Argüello (0000-0001-9456-0620, University of Coimbra) |
| Año | 2026 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2026-03-25 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Capital & Class (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0309-8168 • E-ISSN: 2041-0980 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/03098168261431596 |
| OpenAlex | W7140319138 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 24 |
In an era marked by the global hegemony of neoliberal capitalism and the far right’s increasing popularity, the language of utopia has returned to scholarly and political debate, sometimes in conversation with Marxist positions. Still, the discussion hinges on whether such language propels us beyond capitalist social relations or confines itself to limited liberal ambitions. To clarify this tension, the article first revisits Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels’s ambivalent stance on utopianism, underscoring both their principled skepticism toward speculative blueprints and their conviction that utopia, as a communist horizon, is indispensable to revolutionary praxis. It then interrogates three authors, influenced by Marxist frameworks, who have recently renewed the debate on utopia: Erik Olin Wright’s ‘real utopias’, formulated within analytic Marxism; Michael Albert’s ‘practical utopias’, grounded in libertarian-socialist currents; and Ana Cecilia Dinerstein’s ‘concrete utopias’, who borrows Ernst Bloch’s anticipatory consciousness with autonomist Marxism. Its final aim is to ascertain not only the differences among these three perspectives but, above all, the extent to which their respective frameworks converge with a Marxist conception of utopia as articulated in classical Marxism. We undertake this examination to argue that, despite their attempts to revalidate Marxist utopianism in the present, these perspectives may nonetheless fall short of articulating a horizon that truly transcends the proclaimed end-of-history , one commensurate with the Marxian aspiration to abolish class society and build communism
Alienation · Capitalism · Class conflict · Class consciousness · Communism · Hegemony · Marxist philosophy · Politics · Utopia · Critical Theory and Philosophy · Political Economy and Marxism · Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction
Political Uses of Utopia
On Marxian Utopophobia
Introduction
The Politics of Autonomy in Latin America
Class Counts
Change the World Without Taking Power
The Spirit of Utopia
No Intentions? Utopian Theory After the Future
Nothing is, but what is not’
Marxism and the convergence of utopia and the everyday
More-than-Capitalist Landscapes of Communist Becoming
Socialism, Utopianism and the ‘Utopian socialists’
The New Obscurity
Utopia Defended against the Liberals
The Utopian Vision of the Future (Then and Now)
Not Not but Not yet
Socialism and (the rejection of) utopia
(Im)possibilities of Autonomy
Elements for a Theory of Utopia Production
Hope Abjuring Hope
Marx's Utopian legacy
Organizando La Esperanza
Marx's Concept of the Alternative to Capitalism
Marxisms as Utopias
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |