The ethics of influence in state-regulated schools
Tillson v. Rawls
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 11953258 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Matthew Clayton (University of Warwick, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2024 |
| Volumen | 58 |
| Número | 1 |
| Páginas | 136-142 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2024-01-16 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Journal of Philosophy of Education (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0309-8249 • E-ISSN: 1467-9752 |
| Editorial | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/jopedu/qhae004 |
| OpenAlex | W4391244186 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 3 |
| Referencias citadas | 8 |
John Tillson’s Children, Religion and the Ethics of Influence develops and deploys the ‘epistemic criterion’ for deciding whether teachers should promote belief in particular propositions. He defends that criterion by arguing that it promotes human well-being and enables individuals to fulfil their duty to pursue the truth. In this article I draw on John Rawls’ conception of political liberalism to suggest that the epistemic criterion is an inappropriate basis for the political community’s shaping of children’s beliefs
Epistemology · Sociology · State (computer science · Mathematics · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Psychology · Religion, Theology, and Education · Religious Education and Schools · Philosophy · Social Psychology
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1,5 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 3 |