Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Dingo scat-bone ‘signature patterns’

An actualistic study and comparison of wild and captive scat-bone assemblages and interpretation of bone fragments from Witchcliffe Rock Shelter, south western Australia

Datos Bibliográficos

ID11956501
AutoresJess E Reynolds (0000-0001-7964-6645, The University of Western Australia, autor de correspondencia), Joe Dortch (0000-0002-0510-5456, The University of Western Australia), Jane Balme (0000-0003-1387-9379, The University of Western Australia)
Año2016
Volumen82
Número3
Páginas218-231
Fecha de publicación2016-09-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaAustralian Archaeology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0312-2417 • E-ISSN: 2470-0363
EditorialTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/03122417.2016.1240136
OpenAlexW2553880752
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas2
Referencias citadas45

Dingoes are a likely contributor to late Holocene Australian archaeological sites and distinguishing bone refuse resulting from either human meals or dingo scavenging is a well-recognised problem. To date, little research has been undertaken to differentiate bone modifications caused by different Australian carnivores in archaeological assemblages. In addition, inconsistencies have been found between observations recorded from captive and wild contexts, confounding attempts to use the bone refuse of captive dingos as reference material for the interpretation of archaeological assemblages. It has been suggested that the best results in identifying predators are achieved by combining an analysis of tooth marks with fragmentation patterns. In order to identify dingo ‘signature patterns’ of modification and whether results vary between captive and wild populations, 31 wild and 25 captive scats were disaggregated and analysed. Consistent lengths and breadths of dingo tooth pits on bone from the scats suggest that pits are a good indicator of dingo bone modification, particularly when used in conjunction with fragmentation patterns. Bone deposits from the late Holocene site Witchcliffe Rock Shelter in southwestern Australia, were used as a case study to test the tooth mark and fragmentation patterns identified in the actualistic studies. High levels of fragmentation alongside the presence of tooth pits consistent with those of dingoes suggest that they contributed to the multi-patterned faunal assemblage. Further research to identify signature modification patterns of other Australian carnivores is required

Archaeology · Assemblage (archaeology · Biology · Dingo · Fragmentation (computing · Geography · Holocene · Predation · Tooth wear · Zoology · Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies · Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology · Wildlife Ecology and Conservation · Ecology

  • A Record in Bone

    Carly Monks

  • Analysis of pit and score tooth-mark sizes from bones modified by Holocene Australian terrestrial fauna in relation to body size

    Open Access•L Koungoulos, Patrick Faulkner et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science…•2018

  • Small mammal bone accumulations produced by mammalian carnivores

    Open Access•Peter Andrews, ELIZABETH M NESBIT EVANS•Paleobiology•1983

  • Evidence of carnivore gnawing on Pleistocene and Recent mammalian bones

    Open Access•Gregory Haynes, Gary Haynes•Paleobiology•1980

  • The study of animal bones from archaeological sites

    Raymond E Chaplin•The study of animal bones from…•1971

  • A taphonomic analysis of the faunal assemblage from Yam Camp rockshelter, S.E. Cape York Peninsula

    Open Access•Bernard M J Huchet, Bernard Huchet•Queensland Archaeological Research•1990

  • Palaeo-Environmental Change and the Persistence of Human Occupation in South-Western Australian Forests

    Joe Dortch•Palaeo-environmental change and…•2004

  • Vertebrate Taphonomy

    Open Access•R L Lyman•Vertebrate Taphonomy•1994

  • Five more arguments to invalidate the passive scavenging version of the carnivore-hominid-carnivore model

    Open Access•Manuel Domínguez-Rodrigo, Rebeca Barba•Journal of Human Evolution•2007

  • Walkunder Arch Cave

    Bruno David•Australian Archaeology•1984

  • An Experimental Evaluation of the Criteria used to Distinguish Owl-Deposited Bone in Archaeological Cave Deposits in Australia

    Brendan Marshall•Australian Archaeology•1986

  • A cautionary note on the use of captive carnivores to model wild predator behavior

    Open Access•Agness Gidna, J Yravedra et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2012

  • Blowout Taphonomy

    I J Mcniven, Ian Mcniven•Australian Archaeology•1990

  • Characterization of a current coprogenic sample originated by Canis lupus as a tool for identifying a taphonomic agent

    Open Access•Montserrat Esteban-Nadal, Isabel Cáceres et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2010

  • Feeding the scavengers. Actualistic taphonomy in the Jordan Valley, Israel

    Open Access•E Lotan•International Journal of…•2000

  • Aboriginal responses to Late Quaternary environmental change in a Mediterranean-type region

    Open Access•Joe Dortch, Jane Balme et al.•Quaternary International•2011

  • Toward the Identification of Coyote Scatological Faunal Accumulations in Archaeological Contexts

    Open Access•D N Schmitt, Kenneth E Juell•Journal of Archaeological Science•1994

  • Identifying palaeo-environments and changes in Aboriginal subsistence from dual-patterned faunal assemblages, south-western Australia

    Open Access•Joe Dortch, Richard Wright•Journal of Archaeological Science•2009

  • Bone Modifications Resulting from Captive Chimpanzee Mastication

    Open Access•T R Pickering, Janette Wallis•Journal of Archaeological Science•1997

  • Bower birds, bones and archaeology

    Open Access•Su Solomon, M Minnegal et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•1986

  • Patterns of bovid long limb bone modification created by wild and captive leopards and their relevance to the elaboration of referential frameworks for paleoanthropology

    Open Access•Agness Gidna, Manuel Domínguez-Rodrigo et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science…•2015

  • The use of tooth pits to identify carnivore taxa in tooth-marked archaeofaunas and their relevance to reconstruct hominid carcass processing behaviours

    Open Access•Manuel Domínguez-Rodrigo, Manuel Domı́nguez-Rodrigo et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2003

  • Identifying the Involvement of Multiple Carnivore Taxa with Archaeological Bone Assemblages

    Open Access•Marie M Selvaggio, Joseph Wilder•Journal of Archaeological Science•2001

  • The hunters or the hunted? An introduction to african cave taphonomy

    Open Access•Kathryn Cruxz-Uribe•Journal of Archaeological Science•1982

  • Taphonomic comparison of bone modifications caused by wild and captive wolves (Canis lupus)

    Nohemi Sala, J L Arsuaga et al.•Quaternary International•2013

  • Tasmanian Devil (Sarcophilus harrisii) scat‐bone

    Open Access•Brendan Marshall, Richard Cosgrove•Archaeology in Oceania/Archæology…•1990

  • Carnivores, taphonomy and dietary stress at Puntutjarpa, Serpent's Glen and Intitjikula

    Open Access•Keryn Walshe•Archaeology in Oceania/Archæology…•2000

  • Surface modifications of the Sima de los Huesos fossil humans

    Open Access•Peter Andrews, Yolanda Fernández-Jalvo et al.•Journal of Human Evolution•1997

  • Beyond leopards

    Open Access•T R Pickering, Manuel Domínguez-Rodrigo et al.•Journal of Human Evolution•2004

  • Carcass consumption sequences and the archaeological distinction of scavenging and hunting

    Open Access•Robert J Blumenschine•Journal of Human Evolution•1986

  • Dingoes and Aboriginal social organization in Holocene Australia

    Open Access•Jane Balme, Sue O''Connor•Journal of Archaeological Science…•2015

  • A study of dimensional differences of tooth marks (pits and scores) on bones modified by small and large carnivores

    Open Access•Miriam Andrés, Miriam S Andres et al.•Archaeological and Anthropological…•2012

  • Aboriginal Man's Best Friend

    Open Access•Annette Hamilton•Mankind•2009

  • Taphonomic modifications produced by modern brown bears (Ursus arctos)

    Open Access•P Saladié, Rosa Huguet et al.•International Journal of…•2013

  • A taphonomic study of bone modification and of tooth-mark patterns on long limb bone portions by suids

    Open Access•D Domínguez‐solera, Santiago David Domínguez-Solera et al.•International Journal of…•2009

  • Animal bone finds and economic archaeology

    Hans‐peter Uerpmann•World Archaeology•1973

  • Gone to the Dogs

    Open Access•Ian Walters•Mankind•2010

  • Dingoes

    Open Access•Brian Hayden•Mankind•2009

  • Bones chewed by canids as evidence for human excarnation

    Open Access•Martin J Smith, Martin Smith•Antiquity•2006

  • Impact of Carnivore Ravaging on Zooarchaeological Measures of Element Abundance

    Open Access•C W Marean, Lillian M Spencer•American Antiquity•1991

Obras citantes distintas2
Citas por año0,25
Intervalo de citas2018 - 2018 (1)
Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 2
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae