Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Automated decision-making and good administration

Views from inside the government machinery

Datos Bibliográficos

ID12079020
AutoresUlrik Roehl (0000-0003-1242-0902, Copenhagen Business School, autor de correspondencia)
Año2023
Volumen40
Número4
Páginas101864-101864
Fecha de publicación2023-08-22
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaGovernment Information Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0740-624X • E-ISSN: 1872-9517
EditorialElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.giq.2023.101864
OpenAlexW4386062966
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas6
Referencias citadas40

Use of semi- and fully automated, administrative decision-making in public administration is increasing. Despite this increase, few studies have explicitly analysed its relation to good administration. Good administration is regulations and norms aimed at securing the correctness of administrative decisions as well as the legitimacy of these and is often associated with underlying values such as transparency, equality of treatment and accountability. Based on a thematic analysis of qualitative interviews with 43 key public administration stakeholders in a wide array of policy areas in Denmark, insiders of government machinery are shown to perceive relations between automated decision-making and good administration as manifold. Automated, administrative decision-making is articulated as providing both opportunities for supporting good administration and undermining good administration. Six values of good administration particularly related to automated, administrative decision-making are identified: Carefulness; Respecting-individual-rights; Professionalism; Trustworthiness; Responsiveness and Empowerment. Put simply, risks to good administration can be expected to occur if administrative bodies apply automated, administrative decision-making, while opportunities must be actively nurtured through managerial attention. Despite popular conceptions of the threat of “robotic government”, the conclusions of this study indicate a need for a more pragmatic view of relations of automated, administrative decision-making and good administration balanced between outright techno-optimism and techno-pessimism

Administration (probate law · Business · Government (linguistics · Political science · Computer Science · E-Government and Public Services · Law · Public Administration · Public Policy and Administration Research · Taxation and Compliance Studies

  • Checks and balances under pressure in the welfare state

    Open Access•Maarten Bouwmeester•European Journal of Social Security•2025

  • Experiencing Social Exclusion and Distrust

    Open Access•Hannele Palukka, Anne Koski et al.•Social Inclusion•2025

  • Is Algorithmic Accessibility Sufficient? The Pivotal Role of Accessibility and Accountability in Shaping Trust in Automated Decision‐Making

    Open Access•Limei Gu, Zongfeng Sun•Governance•2025

  • Hybrid images of generative AI

    Open Access•Liang Zhu, Tianyi Gao•Government Information Quarterly•2026

  • Tensions in time-saving technologies

    Open Access•Louise Jørring, Lise Justesen et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2025

  • Ironies of automation and their implications for public service automation

    Open Access•Ida Lindgren•Government Information Quarterly•2024

  • Improving public services using artificial intelligence

    Paul Henman•Asia Pacific Journal of Public…•2020

  • Managing e‐Government

    Open Access•Jeremy Rose, John Stouby Persson et al.•Information Systems Journal•2015

  • Translocal empowerment in transformative social innovation networks

    Open Access•Flor Avelino, Adina Dumitru et al.•European Planning Studies•2020

  • Rethink government with AI

    Open Access•Helen Z Margetts, Helen Margetts et al.•Nature•2019

  • Management Fashion

    Eric Abrahamson•Academy of Management Review•1996

  • Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research

    Open Access•Dennis A Gioia, Kevin G Corley et al.•Organizational Research Methods•2013

  • Discretion and the Quest for Controlled Freedom

    Open Access•Peter Mascini, Tony Evans et al.•Discretion and the Quest for…•2020

  • The Welfare State, Citizenship, and Bureaucratic Encounters

    Yehenskel Hasenfeld, Jane A Rafferty et al.•Annual Review of Sociology•1987

  • AI governance in the public sector

    Open Access•Maciej Kuziemski, Gianluca Misuraca•Telecommunications Policy•2020

  • Australian Administrative Law

    Open Access•Matthew Groves, H P Lee et al.•Australian Administrative Law•2007

  • Good Administration and Administrative Procedures

    Ponce Ponce•Indiana Journal of Global Legal…•2005

  • Digital discretion

    Open Access•Peter André Busch, Helle Zinner Henriksen•Information Polity•2018

  • Value positions viewed through the lens of automated decision-making

    Open Access•Agneta Ranerup, Helle Zinner Henriksen•Government Information Quarterly•2019

  • Digitization or equality

    Open Access•Karl Kristian Larsson•Government Information Quarterly•2020

  • The perils and pitfalls of explainable AI

    Open Access•Hans De Bruijn, Martijn Warnier et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2021

  • ICT, public values and transformative government

    Frank Bannister, Robert Connolly et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2014

  • The digital cage

    Open Access•Rik Peeters, Arjan Widlak•Government Information Quarterly•2018

  • From one-stop shop to no-stop shop

    Open Access•Hendrik Scholta, Willem Mertens et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2018

  • Integrating Values into Public Service

    Open Access•Kenneth Kernaghan•Public Administration Review•2003

  • Public Values

    Open Access•Torben Beck Jørgensen, Barry Bozeman•Administration & Society•2007

  • From Street‐Level to System‐Level Bureaucracies

    Open Access•Mark Bovens, Stavros Zouridis•Public Administration Review•2002

  • The ‘Iron Cage’ Strengthened? Discretion and Digital Discipline

    Open Access•Frans Jorna, Pieter Wagenaar•Public Administration•2007

  • The Computerization of Social Security

    Open Access•Helen Z Margetts, Helen Margetts•Public Administration•1991

  • To do more, better, faster and more cheaply

    Open Access•Mariusz Maciejewski•International Review of…•2017

  • Toward a General Theory of Action

    Clyde Kluckhohn, Edward Shils et al.•Toward a General Theory of Action•1951

  • Without Affection or Enthusiasm' Problems of Involvement and Attachment in `Responsive' Public Management

    Open Access•Paul Du Gay, Paul Du Gay Paul Du Gay•Organization•2008

  • Interpreting Qualitative Data

    David Silverman•Interpreting Qualitative Data•2015

  • Trust in Scandinavia

    Open Access•Rasmus Fonnesbæk Andersen•Scandinavian Political Studies•2018

  • The Listening Bureaucrat

    Camilla Stivers•Public Administration Review•1994

  • Political Trust and Trustworthiness

    Margaret Levi, Laura Stoker•Annual Review of Political Science•2000

  • The agency of algorithms

    Rik Peeters, Sarah Giest et al.•Information Polity•2020

  • Transparency in algorithmic decision-making

    Pertti Ahonen, Tero Erkkilä et al.•Information Polity•2020

  • Automating Inequality

    Hannah Lebovits•Public Integrity•2019

  • New Public Management Is Dead--Long Live Digital-Era Governance

    Patrick Dunleavy•Journal of Public Administration…•2005

  • A Public Management for All Seasons

    Open Access•Christopher Hood•Public Administration•1991

Obras citantes distintas6
Citas por año3
Intervalo de citas2024 - 2026 (3)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 6

Herramientas

Abrir DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae