Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

The Puzzle of Punitive Memory Laws

New Insights into the Origins and Scope of Punitive Memory Laws

Datos Bibliográficos

ID12149271
AutoresKlaus Bachmann (0000-0003-0946-8198, autor de correspondencia), Igor Lyubashenko (0000-0003-0404-5460, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Warsaw, Poland), Christian Garuka (Lawyer, Kigali, Rwanda), Grażyna Baranowska (0000-0001-6614-9121, Institute of Law Studies, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland), Vjeran Pavlaković (0000-0003-2549-0627, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia)
Año2020
Volumen35
Número4
Páginas996-1012
Fecha de publicación2020-08-04
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaEast European Politics and Societies and Cultures (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0888-3254 • E-ISSN: 1533-8371
EditorialSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0888325420941093
OpenAlexW3046943104
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas4

In recent years and decades, authoritarian regimes and illiberal democracies have passed and enforced punitive memory laws, intending to ban certain interpretations of past events or sheltering official versions of history against challenges. This comes as no surprise in countries whose governments undermine pluralism and assume the existence of a historical truth that is stable over time, invariable, and self-explanatory. But why do liberal democracies, committed to political pluralism and open debate, pass laws that penalize challenges to certain interpretations of the past and restrict freedom of speech? This article argues that liberal democracies may do so yielding to bottom–up pressure by courts and to regulate civil law disputes for which existing legislation and jurisprudence may not suffice. Based on case studies from Germany, France, Switzerland, Poland, Ukraine, Russia, Turkey, Rwanda, and the former Yugoslavia, we also found punitive memory laws in liberal democracies narrower and more precise than in nonliberal states

Authoritarianism · Democracy · Law and economics · Liberal democracy · Pluralism (philosophy · Political science · Politics · Punitive damages · Sociology · Eastern European Communism and Reforms · Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics · Law · Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration

  • “To discipline and punish”

    Open Access•Georgiy Kasianov•Memory Studies•2026

  • Memory laws in vulnerable societies

    Open Access•Mihajlo Vučić•Socioloski pregled•2022

  • Memory Laws on Slavery in France and the Netherlands

    Open Access•Uladzislau Belavusau•Law and Critique•2025

  • History Politics in the Russian – Ukrainian Relations, the 2000s–2022

    Open Access•Georgiy Kasianov•Nationalities Papers•2025

Obras citantes distintas4
Citas por año1
Intervalo de citas2022 - 2026 (5)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 4
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae